This is round n of an experiment where I'd like you to explore some more ML ideas, in part to see where we are with automating ML research.
General constraints:
So far, I've been giving you some high-level ideas to start with, or papers to riff on.
This time, I'd like you to come up with ideas more freely, but with these high-level constraints:
WDYT? First step would be to propose some ideas & plan.
Nice — round n, free-choice edition. Let me think about what fits the two constraints (toy + instantly-legible visualization) and where there's an actual ML question worth probing, not just a demo.
Here are four candidate ideas, roughly in order of how excited I am about them:
Problem: train networks to mark the shortest path through a randomly generated maze (input: maze image, output: path mask).
The ML question: compare a fixed-depth CNN against a weight-tied recurrent CNN that applies the same small block over and over. The recurrent one can be run for more iterations at test time than it was trained with — does extra "thinking time" let it solve harder/bigger mazes than it ever saw in training? This is a genuinely interesting topic (test-time compute, algorithmic extrapolation) in a form that trains in minutes on CPU. There's room for our own variants too, e.g. does giving the recurrent net a "scratchpad" that it can't overwrite help, does a confidence-based stopping rule work.
Visualization: this is the big win. An interactive HTML page: pick a maze size, a model, and drag a "thinking steps" slider — you watch the model's path estimate flicker, spread, and lock onto the route (or fail and dissolve). A non-expert sees within ten seconds which model "gets it" and that small mazes are easy while big ones need more thinking. No domain knowledge needed: either the path lights up or it doesn't.
Problem: learn the dynamics of a toy system (pendulum, ball bouncing in a box, planet orbiting a star) from trajectory data, then roll the model forward for a long time.
The ML question: plain MLP next-state predictor vs residual/integrator-style predictor vs a Hamiltonian-style network that predicts a scalar energy and derives forces from its gradient. The known result is that unconstrained models drift; the fun is in seeing how much structure you need before long rollouts become stable, and trying in-between variants.
Visualization: side-by-side animations of ground truth vs each model's rollout. Failure is viscerally legible — the planet spirals into the sun, the pendulum gains energy and starts windmilling. Plus one energy-vs-time chart. Slightly less interactive than A, but maximally intuitive.
Train a tiny CA update rule (a per-pixel network) to grow a target pixel image from a single seed, then compare training regimes by how well the pattern regenerates when you damage it. Interactive version: click/scrub to erase chunks and watch it regrow. Gorgeous demo, real research texture (stability, pool training, async updates), but training backprops through ~50+ CA steps, so it's the most CPU-expensive of the four — feasible at small grid sizes, but iteration cycles would be slower.
Learn boids-style flocking rules from observed trajectories, comparing a permutation-invariant/GNN-style model against a plain MLP over concatenated neighbors. Nice animations, but "works vs doesn't" is fuzzier to eyeball than A or B — you're judging vibe of a flock, not a binary path-found/orbit-crashed.
A (mazes), with B as a close second. A has the strongest combination: a topical ML question (test-time compute and extrapolation), several genuinely different architectures to pit against each other, cheap CPU training, room for our own twists rather than pure reproduction, and the most compelling interactive visualization — the thinking-steps slider basically is the result.
Plan sketch for A:
D:\claude_code\maze_thinking, reuse the shared venv at ml_venv (torch + numpy already there; no new packages needed — the interactive viz will be a self-contained HTML file with vanilla JS, data baked in as JSON).Budget-wise this should land in the same ~$5-ish range as the previous rounds, with training runs of minutes rather than hours.
Want me to go with A? Or if the physics one (B) appeals more — it's the more "classic" comparison and the crash-and-burn animations are great — I'm happy to do that instead. I'll wait for your pick before touching anything.
Nice! These are all cool. Having recently watched an interesting youtube video about cellular automata, C also looks interesting.
How about we do A for now, but you keep a note somewhere about C so I can follow up in a fresh conversation in the future?
Deal — I'll save C as a future-project note in my memory, then kick off A.
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -c \"import torch, numpy; print(torch.__version__, numpy.__version__)\""
}
2.13.0+cpu 2.5.1
# maze_thinking — STATUS
**Read this first in any new session.**
## What this is
Free-choice round of David's automating-ML-research experiment (started 2026-07-12).
Question: can a weight-tied *recurrent* CNN, trained to mark the shortest path in small
mazes, use extra test-time iterations ("thinking longer") to solve larger mazes than it
was trained on — and how does that compare to fixed-depth CNNs?
Planned comparison: FixedCNN (a few depths) vs RecurrentCNN without input recall vs
RecurrentCNN with recall (input re-fed every iteration). Then one novel twist chosen
based on results. Deliverables: writeup + self-contained interactive HTML viz
(maze picker + thinking-steps slider). Twice-reviewed (code + writeup by independent
subagents) before done.
## Ground rules
- Toy scale, CPU only. Shared venv: `D:\claude_code\ml_venv\Scripts\python.exe`
(torch 2.13.0+cpu, numpy 2.5.1). No new packages without asking David.
- No third-party code. Interactive viz = vanilla JS + baked-in JSON, no CDN.
- Budget target ~$5-ish for the round.
## Design decisions
- Perfect mazes (spanning tree) on c×c cell lattice via iterative randomized DFS,
rendered to (2c+1)×(2c+1) binary images (1=wall). Corridor pixels of a perfect maze
form a tree ⇒ the start→goal path is unique, so "shortest path" = exact-match target.
- Input: 3 channels (walls, start one-hot, goal one-hot). Target: binary path mask
(BFS in image space, includes endpoints). Loss: per-pixel BCE.
- Metrics: pixel accuracy and **solved rate** (thresholded prediction exactly equals
the target mask).
- Train size: c=6 (13×13 images); extrapolation tests up to c=16 (33×33).
- Datasets deduped by hash of (walls,start,goal); test splits disjoint from train.
## State
- Phase 1 (pipeline + sanity): IN PROGRESS.
## Log
- 2026-07-12: project started, scaffold created.
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
"""Maze generation and shortest-path ground truth.
Mazes are "perfect" (spanning-tree) mazes on a c x c cell lattice, generated by
iterative randomized DFS and rendered to (2c+1) x (2c+1) binary images where
1 = wall, 0 = corridor. Cell (r, c) sits at image pixel (2r+1, 2c+1); carving a
passage between adjacent cells clears the pixel between them.
Because the corridor pixels of a perfect maze form a tree, the path between any
two cells is unique, so the shortest path (found by BFS in image space) is an
unambiguous exact-match training target.
"""
import argparse
import hashlib
from collections import deque
import numpy as np
def generate_maze(c: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:
"""Return a (2c+1, 2c+1) uint8 image, 1 = wall."""
s = 2 * c + 1
img = np.ones((s, s), dtype=np.uint8)
visited = np.zeros((c, c), dtype=bool)
r0, c0 = rng.integers(c), rng.integers(c)
visited[r0, c0] = True
img[2 * r0 + 1, 2 * c0 + 1] = 0
stack = [(r0, c0)]
while stack:
r, cc = stack[-1]
neighbors = [
(r + dr, cc + dc)
for dr, dc in ((-1, 0), (1, 0), (0, -1), (0, 1))
if 0 <= r + dr < c and 0 <= cc + dc < c and not visited[r + dr, cc + dc]
]
if not neighbors:
stack.pop()
continue
nr, nc = neighbors[rng.integers(len(neighbors))]
visited[nr, nc] = True
img[2 * nr + 1, 2 * nc + 1] = 0
img[r + nr + 1, cc + nc + 1] = 0 # pixel between the two cells
stack.append((nr, nc))
return img
def shortest_path_mask(walls: np.ndarray, start_px: tuple, goal_px: tuple) -> np.ndarray:
"""BFS over corridor pixels; returns uint8 mask of the unique path (incl. endpoints)."""
s = walls.shape[0]
parent = -np.ones((s, s, 2), dtype=np.int32)
seen = np.zeros((s, s), dtype=bool)
seen[start_px] = True
q = deque([start_px])
while q:
r, c = q.popleft()
if (r, c) == goal_px:
break
for dr, dc in ((-1, 0), (1, 0), (0, -1), (0, 1)):
nr, nc = r + dr, c + dc
if 0 <= nr < s and 0 <= nc < s and not seen[nr, nc] and walls[nr, nc] == 0:
seen[nr, nc] = True
parent[nr, nc] = (r, c)
q.append((nr, nc))
else:
raise RuntimeError("goal unreachable — maze generation is broken")
mask = np.zeros((s, s), dtype=np.uint8)
r, c = goal_px
while (r, c) != start_px:
mask[r, c] = 1
r, c = parent[r, c]
mask[start_px] = 1
return mask
def example_hash(walls: np.ndarray, start: tuple, goal: tuple) -> str:
h = hashlib.sha1(walls.tobytes())
h.update(bytes(list(start) + list(goal)))
return h.hexdigest()
def build_dataset(n: int, c: int, seed: int, exclude_hashes: set | None = None):
"""Generate n unique examples. Returns (dict of arrays, set of hashes)."""
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
exclude = set(exclude_hashes) if exclude_hashes else set()
hashes: set[str] = set()
walls_l, path_l, start_l, goal_l = [], [], [], []
attempts = 0
while len(walls_l) < n:
attempts += 1
if attempts > 50 * n:
raise RuntimeError(f"too many collisions generating c={c} dataset")
walls = generate_maze(c, rng)
cells = rng.choice(c * c, size=2, replace=False)
start = (2 * (cells[0] // c) + 1, 2 * (cells[0] % c) + 1)
goal = (2 * (cells[1] // c) + 1, 2 * (cells[1] % c) + 1)
h = example_hash(walls, start, goal)
if h in hashes or h in exclude:
continue
hashes.add(h)
walls_l.append(walls)
path_l.append(shortest_path_mask(walls, start, goal))
start_l.append(start)
goal_l.append(goal)
data = {
"walls": np.stack(walls_l),
"path": np.stack(path_l),
"start": np.array(start_l, dtype=np.int32),
"goal": np.array(goal_l, dtype=np.int32),
}
return data, hashes
def to_input(walls: np.ndarray, start: np.ndarray, goal: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""(N,s,s) walls + (N,2) start/goal -> (N,3,s,s) float32 model input."""
n, s, _ = walls.shape
x = np.zeros((n, 3, s, s), dtype=np.float32)
x[:, 0] = walls
idx = np.arange(n)
x[idx, 1, start[:, 0], start[:, 1]] = 1.0
x[idx, 2, goal[:, 0], goal[:, 1]] = 1.0
return x
def ascii_maze(walls: np.ndarray, path: np.ndarray, start: tuple, goal: tuple) -> str:
chars = np.where(walls == 1, "#", " ").astype(object)
chars[path == 1] = "."
chars[tuple(start)] = "S"
chars[tuple(goal)] = "G"
return "\n".join("".join(row) for row in chars)
if __name__ == "__main__":
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--preview", action="store_true", help="print a sample maze")
ap.add_argument("--cells", type=int, default=6)
ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)
args = ap.parse_args()
if args.preview:
data, _ = build_dataset(1, args.cells, args.seed)
print(ascii_maze(data["walls"][0], data["path"][0], data["start"][0], data["goal"][0]))
print(f"path length: {int(data['path'][0].sum())} pixels")
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\mazes.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\mazes.py --preview --cells 6; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\mazes.py --preview --cells 12 --seed 3"
}
############# #S.... # # ###.##### # # #.# # ### #.# ##### # #G# # # ### ##### # # # # # # ### # # ### # # # # # # ### ### ### # # # # ############# path length: 9 pixels ######################### # # # # ####### ####### ##### # # # # # # ##### # ########### ##### # # # # # # # ##### # ####### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### ### # ##### # # # # # # # # # ##### ### ### # ### ### # # # # # # # # ####### # ############# # # # # # # # ### # ####### ##### # #S# # # # # # # # #.# # # ### # ##### ### # #.# # # # # # # #.# # # # ### # # ####### #.# # # # # # # # # # #.### # # # # # ##### # # #...#G # # # # # # # #.#.### ######### # # # # #...# # # ######################### path length: 15 pixels
"""Models: fixed-depth residual CNN vs weight-tied recurrent CNN (with/without recall).
All models are fully convolutional (3x3 convs, no pooling/padding tricks), so they
run on any maze size. Output is a single logit map over pixels; the target is the
shortest-path mask.
"""
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
def conv3(cin: int, cout: int) -> nn.Conv2d:
return nn.Conv2d(cin, cout, kernel_size=3, padding=1, bias=False)
class ResBlock(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, width: int):
super().__init__()
self.c1 = conv3(width, width)
self.c2 = conv3(width, width)
self.act = nn.ReLU()
def forward(self, s):
return self.act(s + self.c2(self.act(self.c1(s))))
class FixedCNN(nn.Module):
"""Encoder + `depth` residual blocks (untied weights) + head."""
def __init__(self, width: int = 64, depth: int = 8):
super().__init__()
self.encode = nn.Sequential(conv3(3, width), nn.ReLU())
self.blocks = nn.Sequential(*[ResBlock(width) for _ in range(depth)])
self.head = nn.Conv2d(width, 1, kernel_size=3, padding=1)
def forward(self, x, iters=None, return_all=False):
out = self.head(self.blocks(self.encode(x)))
return [out] if return_all else out
class RecurrentCNN(nn.Module):
"""Encoder + ONE residual block applied `iters` times (weights tied) + head.
recall=True re-concatenates the raw 3-channel input to the state at every
iteration, so the maze can't be forgotten as the state evolves.
"""
def __init__(self, width: int = 64, recall: bool = True):
super().__init__()
self.recall = recall
self.encode = nn.Sequential(conv3(3, width), nn.ReLU())
cin = width + 3 if recall else width
self.c1 = conv3(cin, width)
self.c2 = conv3(width, width)
self.act = nn.ReLU()
self.head = nn.Conv2d(width, 1, kernel_size=3, padding=1)
def step(self, s, x):
inp = torch.cat([s, x], dim=1) if self.recall else s
return self.act(s + self.c2(self.act(self.c1(inp))))
def forward(self, x, iters: int = 20, return_all: bool = False):
s = self.encode(x)
outs = []
for _ in range(iters):
s = self.step(s, x)
if return_all:
outs.append(self.head(s))
return outs if return_all else self.head(s)
def make_model(name: str, width: int, depth: int) -> nn.Module:
if name == "fixed":
return FixedCNN(width, depth)
if name == "recurrent":
return RecurrentCNN(width, recall=False)
if name == "recall":
return RecurrentCNN(width, recall=True)
raise ValueError(name)
def count_params(model: nn.Module) -> int:
return sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters())
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\models.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
"""Train one model on small mazes; log per-epoch metrics to JSON.
Datasets are generated on first use and cached in data/ as .npz, keyed by
(n, cells, seed). Train-set hashes are cached alongside so evaluation sets can
be generated disjoint from training data.
"""
import argparse
import json
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from mazes import build_dataset, to_input
from models import count_params, make_model
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
DATA = ROOT / "data"
DATA.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
def get_dataset(n: int, cells: int, seed: int, exclude_hashes: set | None = None):
"""Load or generate a dataset. Returns (x, y, hashes)."""
tag = f"n{n}_c{cells}_s{seed}"
f = DATA / f"maze_{tag}.npz"
if f.exists():
z = np.load(f)
data = {k: z[k] for k in ("walls", "path", "start", "goal")}
hashes = set(z["hashes"].tolist())
else:
data, hashes = build_dataset(n, cells, seed, exclude_hashes)
np.savez_compressed(f, **data, hashes=np.array(sorted(hashes)))
x = to_input(data["walls"], data["start"], data["goal"])
y = data["path"].astype(np.float32)[:, None] # (N,1,s,s)
return torch.from_numpy(x), torch.from_numpy(y), hashes
@torch.no_grad()
def evaluate(model, x, y, iters: int, batch: int = 256):
"""Returns (pixel_acc, solved_rate)."""
model.eval()
correct_px, total_px, solved = 0, 0, 0
for i in range(0, len(x), batch):
xb, yb = x[i : i + batch], y[i : i + batch]
pred = (model(xb, iters=iters) > 0).float()
eq = pred == yb
correct_px += eq.sum().item()
total_px += eq.numel()
solved += eq.flatten(1).all(dim=1).sum().item()
return correct_px / total_px, solved / len(x)
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--model", choices=["fixed", "recurrent", "recall"], required=True)
ap.add_argument("--width", type=int, default=64)
ap.add_argument("--depth", type=int, default=8, help="blocks (fixed model only)")
ap.add_argument("--train-iters", type=int, default=20, help="recurrent iterations")
ap.add_argument("--n-train", type=int, default=20000)
ap.add_argument("--n-val", type=int, default=1000)
ap.add_argument("--cells", type=int, default=6)
ap.add_argument("--epochs", type=int, default=10)
ap.add_argument("--batch", type=int, default=32)
ap.add_argument("--lr", type=float, default=1e-3)
ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)
ap.add_argument("--out", required=True, help="run directory under runs/")
args = ap.parse_args()
torch.manual_seed(args.seed)
out = ROOT / "runs" / args.out
out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
# data seeds: train=1000+seed, val=2000+seed (val generated disjoint from train)
xtr, ytr, tr_hashes = get_dataset(args.n_train, args.cells, 1000 + args.seed)
xva, yva, _ = get_dataset(args.n_val, args.cells, 2000 + args.seed, exclude_hashes=tr_hashes)
model = make_model(args.model, args.width, args.depth)
iters = args.train_iters if args.model in ("recurrent", "recall") else None
print(f"{args.model} width={args.width} depth={args.depth} iters={iters} "
f"params={count_params(model):,}")
opt = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=args.lr)
lossf = nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss()
log = {"config": vars(args), "params": count_params(model), "epochs": []}
for epoch in range(args.epochs):
model.train()
t0 = time.time()
perm = torch.randperm(len(xtr))
total_loss, nb = 0.0, 0
for i in range(0, len(xtr), args.batch):
idx = perm[i : i + args.batch]
opt.zero_grad()
outp = model(xtr[idx], iters=iters)
loss = lossf(outp, ytr[idx])
loss.backward()
opt.step()
total_loss += loss.item()
nb += 1
px, solved = evaluate(model, xva, yva, iters=iters)
rec = {"epoch": epoch, "loss": total_loss / nb, "val_pixel_acc": px,
"val_solved": solved, "secs": round(time.time() - t0, 1)}
log["epochs"].append(rec)
print(rec)
torch.save(model.state_dict(), out / "model.pt")
(out / "log.json").write_text(json.dumps(log, indent=1))
print("done ->", out)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Quick sanity run: a small fixed CNN on 3k mazes to verify the pipeline learns.
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\train.py --model fixed --width 32 --depth 6 --n-train 3000 --n-val 500 --epochs 3 --out sanity_fixed",
"timeout": 600000
}
fixed width=32 depth=6 iters=None params=111,745
{'epoch': 0, 'loss': 0.32071023307582164, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.8829822485207101, 'val_solved': 0.02, 'secs': 1.6}
{'epoch': 1, 'loss': 0.23710662443587122, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.8832071005917159, 'val_solved': 0.0, 'secs': 1.6}
{'epoch': 2, 'loss': 0.2178116393216113, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.890094674556213, 'val_solved': 0.0, 'secs': 1.6}
done -> D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\sanity_fixed{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\train.py --model fixed --width 64 --depth 8 --n-train 10000 --n-val 1000 --epochs 10 --out sanity_fixed_w64",
"timeout": 600000
}
fixed width=64 depth=8 iters=None params=592,129
{'epoch': 0, 'loss': 0.24700406817392037, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.8999704142011834, 'val_solved': 0.021, 'secs': 15.2}
{'epoch': 1, 'loss': 0.17307601090722952, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9174082840236686, 'val_solved': 0.016, 'secs': 15.4}
{'epoch': 2, 'loss': 0.12912674621937756, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9547455621301775, 'val_solved': 0.146, 'secs': 15.2}
{'epoch': 3, 'loss': 0.0969839622489751, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9805325443786982, 'val_solved': 0.48, 'secs': 15.0}
{'epoch': 4, 'loss': 0.037364628600379146, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9910059171597633, 'val_solved': 0.695, 'secs': 15.0}
{'epoch': 5, 'loss': 0.01937147875215275, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9930059171597633, 'val_solved': 0.732, 'secs': 15.0}
{'epoch': 6, 'loss': 0.06002264682682582, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9902485207100592, 'val_solved': 0.7, 'secs': 15.1}
{'epoch': 7, 'loss': 0.01390879443502976, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9932366863905325, 'val_solved': 0.783, 'secs': 16.0}
{'epoch': 8, 'loss': 0.007293689415787165, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9972189349112426, 'val_solved': 0.888, 'secs': 15.8}
{'epoch': 9, 'loss': 0.004522926858788097, 'val_pixel_acc': 0.9979704142011835, 'val_solved': 0.923, 'secs': 15.9}
done -> D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\sanity_fixed_w64[auto-memory content redacted for sharing]
from mazes import build_dataset, to_input from models import count_params, make_model ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
from mazes import build_dataset, to_input from models import count_params, make_model torch.set_num_threads(12) # physical cores on this machine ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
"""Phase 2 driver: train the four comparison models sequentially.
Skips any run whose log.json already shows all epochs finished, so the driver
can simply be relaunched if the machine is switched off mid-way.
"""
import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
PY = sys.executable
COMMON = ["--width", "64", "--n-train", "20000", "--n-val", "1000",
"--epochs", "20", "--seed", "0"]
RUNS = [
(["--model", "fixed", "--depth", "8"], "p2_fixed_d8"),
(["--model", "fixed", "--depth", "16"], "p2_fixed_d16"),
(["--model", "recurrent", "--train-iters", "20"], "p2_rec_plain_i20"),
(["--model", "recall", "--train-iters", "20"], "p2_rec_recall_i20"),
]
def finished(out: str) -> bool:
f = ROOT / "runs" / out / "log.json"
if not f.exists():
return False
log = json.loads(f.read_text())
return len(log["epochs"]) >= log["config"]["epochs"]
for extra, out in RUNS:
if finished(out):
print(f"[driver] {out}: already finished, skipping", flush=True)
continue
print(f"[driver] starting {out}", flush=True)
r = subprocess.run([PY, "-u", str(ROOT / "train.py"), *extra, *COMMON, "--out", out])
if r.returncode != 0:
print(f"[driver] {out} FAILED (rc={r.returncode}), aborting", flush=True)
sys.exit(1)
print("[driver] all phase 2 runs complete", flush=True)
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\run_phase2.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs | Out-Null; Start-Process -FilePath D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -ArgumentList \"-u\",\"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\run_phase2.py\" -RedirectStandardOutput D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase2.log -RedirectStandardError D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase2.err -WorkingDirectory D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking -WindowStyle Hidden; Start-Sleep -Seconds 5; Get-Process python | Select-Object Id, StartTime; Get-Content D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase2.log"
}
Id StartTime -- --------- 1636 12/07/2026 13:13:19 4516 12/07/2026 13:13:19 13012 12/07/2026 13:13:19 14112 12/07/2026 13:13:19 [driver] starting p2_fixed_d8
"""Evaluate a trained run across maze sizes and (for recurrent models) test-time iterations.
For recurrent models the forward pass is run once to the max iteration count with
return_all=True, and every intermediate output is scored — so a full iteration sweep
costs one long rollout. Test sets are freshly seeded and, at the training size,
explicitly disjoint from the training hashes.
Writes runs/<run>/eval.json:
{"size": {"<cells>": {"<iters>": {"pixel_acc": ..., "solved": ...}}}}
(fixed models get a single entry under iters key "0").
"""
import argparse
import json
from pathlib import Path
import torch
from models import make_model
from train import get_dataset
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
@torch.no_grad()
def sweep(model, x, y, iter_list, batch=64):
"""Score model at each iteration count in iter_list. Returns {iters: metrics}."""
max_it = max(iter_list)
stats = {t: [0, 0, 0] for t in iter_list} # correct_px, total_px, solved
for i in range(0, len(x), batch):
xb, yb = x[i : i + batch], y[i : i + batch]
outs = model(xb, iters=max_it, return_all=True)
for t in iter_list:
pred = (outs[t - 1] > 0).float() if len(outs) > 1 else (outs[0] > 0).float()
eq = pred == yb
stats[t][0] += eq.sum().item()
stats[t][1] += eq.numel()
stats[t][2] += eq.flatten(1).all(dim=1).sum().item()
return {t: {"pixel_acc": s[0] / s[1], "solved": s[2] / len(x)} for t, s in stats.items()}
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--run", required=True)
ap.add_argument("--sizes", default="6,8,10,12,16")
ap.add_argument("--iters", default="5,10,20,30,50,100,200")
ap.add_argument("--n-test", type=int, default=500)
args = ap.parse_args()
run_dir = ROOT / "runs" / args.run
cfg = json.loads((run_dir / "log.json").read_text())["config"]
model = make_model(cfg["model"], cfg["width"], cfg["depth"])
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(run_dir / "model.pt", weights_only=True))
model.eval()
recurrent = cfg["model"] in ("recurrent", "recall")
iter_list = [int(t) for t in args.iters.split(",")] if recurrent else [0]
# hashes of this run's training set (cached by train.py)
_, _, train_hashes = get_dataset(cfg["n_train"], cfg["cells"], 1000 + cfg["seed"])
results = {}
for c in (int(s) for s in args.sizes.split(",")):
exclude = train_hashes if c == cfg["cells"] else None
x, y, _ = get_dataset(args.n_test, c, 3000, exclude_hashes=exclude)
if recurrent:
res = sweep(model, x, y, iter_list)
else:
res = {0: sweep(model, x, y, [1])[1]} # fixed net ignores iters
results[c] = res
print(args.run, f"c={c}:", {t: round(r["solved"], 3) for t, r in res.items()}, flush=True)
out = {str(c): {str(t): r for t, r in res.items()} for c, res in results.items()}
(run_dir / "eval.json").write_text(json.dumps(out, indent=1))
print("wrote", run_dir / "eval.json")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\eval.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"query": "select:Monitor",
"max_results": 1
}
{
"type": "tool_reference",
"tool_name": "Monitor"
}{
"command": "tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\"",
"persistent": true,
"timeout_ms": 3600000
}
Monitor started (task b15k5z9es, persistent — runs until TaskStop or session end). You will be notified on each event. Keep working — do not poll or sleep. Events may arrive while you are waiting for the user — an event is not their reply.
Monitor armed. Updating STATUS.md with Phase 1 results, then building the visualization-export script while training runs.
## State - Phase 1 (pipeline + sanity): IN PROGRESS. ## Log - 2026-07-12: project started, scaffold created.
## State
- Phase 1 (pipeline + sanity): DONE. FixedCNN w64 d8 reaches 92.3% val solved on c=6
after 10 epochs (~15 s/epoch, 10k mazes). Pixel acc ~0.89 is the trivial all-zeros
level — watch **solved rate**, not pixel acc.
- Phase 2 (main comparison): TRAINING as of 2026-07-12 ~13:15. Driver `run_phase2.py`
launched detached (log: logs/phase2.log), trains sequentially: fixed d8, fixed d16,
recurrent-plain i20, recurrent-recall i20 (all w64, 20k mazes c=6, 20 epochs).
Driver skips already-finished runs, so just relaunch it if the machine was rebooted.
Monitor watching the log. After training: eval.py per run (sizes 6-16, iters 5-200).
## Files
- mazes.py — generation (`--preview` to eyeball), BFS targets, dataset build + dedupe
- models.py — FixedCNN / RecurrentCNN(recall=T/F); all fully convolutional
- train.py — single training run; caches datasets in data/, saves runs/<out>/{model.pt,log.json}
- run_phase2.py — sequential driver for the 4 phase-2 runs (resumable at run granularity)
- eval.py — size × iteration sweep → runs/<run>/eval.json (one rollout scores all iters)
## Log
- 2026-07-12: project started, scaffold created. Phase 1 sanity passed; phase 2 launched.The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
That's just the monitor replaying the start line. Writing the viz-export script now.
"""Export sample mazes + per-iteration model predictions as JSON for the interactive viewer.
For each sample maze and each recurrent run, stores the sigmoid probability map at a
subsampled schedule of thinking steps (dense early, sparser late), quantized to uint8
and base64-encoded. Fixed runs store their single output map. Output: viz_data.json.
"""
import argparse
import base64
import json
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import torch
from models import make_model
from train import get_dataset
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
# thinking steps to store: every step to 40, then sparser out to 200
STEPS = list(range(1, 41)) + list(range(45, 101, 5)) + list(range(110, 201, 10))
def b64(arr: np.ndarray) -> str:
return base64.b64encode(arr.astype(np.uint8).tobytes()).decode()
def quantize(logits: torch.Tensor) -> np.ndarray:
return (torch.sigmoid(logits).numpy() * 255).round()
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--runs", required=True, help="comma-separated run names")
ap.add_argument("--sizes", default="6,10,16")
ap.add_argument("--per-size", type=int, default=3)
ap.add_argument("--n-test", type=int, default=500, help="must match eval.py's test sets")
args = ap.parse_args()
runs = []
for name in args.runs.split(","):
cfg = json.loads((ROOT / "runs" / name / "log.json").read_text())["config"]
model = make_model(cfg["model"], cfg["width"], cfg["depth"])
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(ROOT / "runs" / name / "model.pt", weights_only=True))
model.eval()
runs.append((name, cfg, model))
mazes = []
with torch.no_grad():
for c in (int(s) for s in args.sizes.split(",")):
x, y, _ = get_dataset(args.n_test, c, 3000) # same sets eval.py scores
for i in range(args.per_size):
xi = x[i : i + 1]
walls = xi[0, 0].numpy()
start = np.argwhere(xi[0, 1].numpy() == 1)[0]
goal = np.argwhere(xi[0, 2].numpy() == 1)[0]
entry = {
"cells": c, "size": walls.shape[0],
"walls": b64(walls), "path": b64(y[0 + i, 0].numpy()),
"start": start.tolist(), "goal": goal.tolist(),
"preds": {},
}
for name, cfg, model in runs:
if cfg["model"] in ("recurrent", "recall"):
outs = model(xi, iters=max(STEPS), return_all=True)
maps = np.stack([quantize(outs[t - 1][0, 0]) for t in STEPS])
entry["preds"][name] = {"steps": STEPS, "maps": b64(maps)}
else:
out = model(xi)
entry["preds"][name] = {"steps": [0], "maps": b64(quantize(out[0, 0]))}
mazes.append(entry)
meta = [{"id": name, "model": cfg["model"], "depth": cfg["depth"],
"train_iters": cfg["train_iters"]} for name, cfg, _ in runs]
out = {"runs": meta, "mazes": mazes}
(ROOT / "viz_data.json").write_text(json.dumps(out))
kb = (ROOT / "viz_data.json").stat().st_size // 1024
print(f"wrote viz_data.json ({kb} KB, {len(mazes)} mazes, {len(runs)} runs)")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viz_export.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\viz_export.py --runs sanity_fixed_w64 --sizes 6,10 --per-size 2"
}
wrote viz_data.json (5 KB, 4 mazes, 1 runs)
if f.exists():
z = np.load(f)
data = {k: z[k] for k in ("walls", "path", "start", "goal")}
hashes = set(z["hashes"].tolist())
else: if f.exists():
z = np.load(f)
data = {k: z[k] for k in ("walls", "path", "start", "goal")}
hashes = set(z["hashes"].tolist())
if exclude_hashes and hashes & set(exclude_hashes):
raise RuntimeError(
f"{f} was cached without the requested exclusion and overlaps it; "
f"delete the file to regenerate"
)
else:The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Remove-Item D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\data\\maze_n500_c6_s3000.npz -Confirm:$false; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -c \"import sys; sys.path.insert(0, r'D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking'); from train import get_dataset; _,_,tr = get_dataset(20000, 6, 1000); x,y,te = get_dataset(500, 6, 3000, exclude_hashes=tr); print('c6 test regenerated, overlap with train:', len(tr & te))\"",
"timeout": 300000
}
c6 test regenerated, overlap with train: 0
Now the interactive viewer. It'll include line charts of solved-rate vs thinking steps, so let me load the dataviz skill first as required before writing chart code.
{
"skill": "dataviz"
}
Launching skill: dataviz
Base directory for this skill: C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\bundled-skills\2.1.205\f55bc60ee4c273e41f42bb57ed3b6c7a\dataviz
A chart is read by people and executed by you. This skill turns "make it look good" into a procedure with checks, so the result is right by construction rather than by taste.
The method here is design-system-agnostic. Nothing in the procedure, the form
heuristic, the six checks, or the mark specs is specific to one product. A design
system supplies a small set of parameters (its ramps, a categorical order, a
diverging pair, a status palette, a texture, its surfaces, its filter components);
the method consumes them unchanged. A validated default palette is the
reference instance, fully specified in references/palette.md. To target your
brand, read that file's structure and substitute its values — touch nothing else.
The single most important habit: the color part is computable, so compute it. Never eyeball whether a palette is colorblind-safe — run
scripts/validate_palette.js.
Color comes LAST. Most bad charts pick colors first.
references/choosing-a-form.mdreferences/color-formula.mdnode scripts/validate_palette.js "<hex,hex,…>" --mode light (relative to
this skill's base directory — or load it as <script type="module"> in the
chart's own page, where it reads
data-palette off <body> and logs a console.table report). It returns
pass/fail on the lightness band, chroma floor, adjacent-pair CVD separation,
and contrast. Fix anything that FAILs before continuing. Re-run for
--mode dark with that mode's surface.references/marks-and-anatomy.mdreferences/interaction.mdThen check the result against references/anti-patterns.md — it is the catalog
of what goes wrong. If your chart matches an entry, it's wrong.
The method is invariant; only these parameters change per system. The reference
instance — every value filled in — is references/palette.md.
| Parameter | What the system provides |
|---|---|
| Ramps | the hue scales (named steps) the palette draws from |
| Categorical theme | the fixed hue order (a named theme); default + alternates |
| Sequential hue | the default single hue for magnitude |
| Diverging pair | two warm/cool poles + a neutral midpoint |
| Status palette | good / warning / serious / critical — steps distinct from categorical |
| Texture fill | one directional hand-drawn fill, used at 45° / 135° |
| Surfaces | light & dark chart-surface colors (the validator needs these) |
| Filter controls | date-range & dimension controls (behavioral spec in interaction.md) |
To onboard a new system: fill those rows, feed its ramps to the validator, and let it snap each slot to the nearest passing step. Structure and rules stay as written.
| File | What it answers |
|---|---|
references/choosing-a-form.md |
Which chart type / is it even a chart? |
references/color-formula.md |
The four jobs, the six checks, snap-to-passing |
references/marks-and-anatomy.md |
Mark specs, spacers, labels, figures, hero number |
references/interaction.md |
Tooltips & hover, filters & time ranges |
references/components.md |
The pieces a chart is made of — build each in plain HTML |
references/anti-patterns.md |
What goes wrong — check every chart against this |
references/palette.md |
The reference palette instance — every parameter, filled in; swap for your brand's |
scripts/validate_palette.js |
Runnable six-checks validator (run it; don't eyeball) |
1 # Reference palette
2
3 This is the **reference instance** of the data-viz method: every parameter the
4 method needs, filled in with a validated default palette. The rest of the skill
5 is system-agnostic — **to target your brand, substitute this file's values** and
6 re-run the validator. Nothing else changes.
7
8 ## How to use these values
9
10 Everything below is plain hex. In an HTML chart, **define the slots you use as
11 CSS custom properties in a local `<style>` block** at the top of the file, then
12 reference them by role throughout — so the light/dark values swap in one place,
13 and the chart body is written against roles rather than raw hex:
14
15 ```css
16 .viz-root {
17 --surface-1: #fcfcfb; /* chart surface */
18 --text-primary: #0b0b0b;
19 --text-secondary: #52514e;
20 --series-1: #2a78d6; /* categorical slot 1 */
21 /* …only the roles this chart uses */
22 }
23 @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
24 .viz-root {
25 --surface-1: #1a1a19;
26 --text-primary: #ffffff;
27 --text-secondary: #c3c2b7;
28 --series-1: #3987e5;
29 }
30 }
31 ```
32
33 ## Categorical palette
34
35 Both modes are selected. The dark column is the same eight hues stepped for the
36 dark surface, not a separate palette:
37
38 | Slot | Hue | Light | Dark |
39 |------|-----|-------|------|
40 | 1 | blue | `#2a78d6` | `#3987e5` |
41 | 2 | aqua | `#1baf7a` | `#199e70` |
42 | 3 | yellow | `#eda100` | `#c98500` |
43 | 4 | green | `#008300` | `#008300` |
44 | 5 | violet | `#4a3aa7` | `#9085e9` |
45 | 6 | red | `#e34948` | `#e66767` |
46 | 7 | magenta | `#e87ba4` | `#d55181` |
47 | 8 | orange | `#eb6834` | `#d95926` |
48
49 Light-mode worst adjacent CVD ΔE is 24.2 — well clear of the ≥12 target. Three
50 light-mode slots (aqua, yellow, magenta) sit below 3:1 contrast on the light
51 surface: the **relief rule** applies (ship visible direct labels or the table
52 view). The dark steps were chosen for the dark band (OKLCH L ≈ 0.48–0.67, ≥ 3:1
53 on the dark surface) and validated as a set — worst adjacent ΔE 10.3, the floor
54 band, so four-plus series lean on direct labels or texture in dark mode too.
55
56 The slot **ordering** is the CVD-safety mechanism, not cosmetic — it was derived
57 by enumerating orderings and picking the one that maximizes the minimum adjacent
58 ΔE (see `color-formula.md` § Themes). When you swap in your brand's hues, do the
59 same: run the validator on candidate orderings and keep the best.
60
61 ## Sequential hue
62
63 Default single hue: **blue**, light→dark. When two sequential contexts appear at
64 once, the second takes the next categorical slot's hue (aqua), each as its own
65 one-hue ramp.
66
67 | step | hex | step | hex | step | hex | step | hex |
68 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
69 | 100 | `#cde2fb` | 250 | `#86b6ef` | 400 | `#3987e5` | 550 | `#1c5cab` |
70 | 150 | `#b7d3f6` | 300 | `#6da7ec` | 450 | `#2a78d6` | 600 | `#184f95` |
71 | 200 | `#9ec5f4` | 350 | `#5598e7` | 500 | `#256abf` | 650 | `#104281` |
72 | | | | | | | 700 | `#0d366b` |
73
74 The full 100→700 range is for **sequential** encoding (continuous magnitude —
75 heatmaps, choropleths) where the lightest step means "near zero" and is allowed
76 to recede toward the surface. For an **ordinal** ramp (discrete ordered marks —
77 funnel stages, tiers — validated with `--ordinal`), the step nearest the surface
78 must still clear 2:1: on light, start no lighter than **step 250** (`#86b6ef`,
79 2.06:1); on dark, go no darker than **step 600** (`#184f95`, 2.15:1).
80
81 ## Diverging pair
82
83 **blue ↔ red** — warm/cool poles that read as opposite. Neutral midpoint is gray
84 (light `#f0efec`, dark `#383835`). Equal step count per arm. (blue↔aqua was
85 rejected — both cool, the midpoint doesn't read as "nothing".)
86
87 ## Status palette (fixed — never themed)
88
89 | role | hex | light-surface contrast | dark-surface contrast |
90 |---|---|---|---|
91 | good | `#0ca30c` | 3.27 | 5.19 |
92 | warning | `#fab219` | 1.79 | 9.49 |
93 | serious | `#ec835a` | 2.57 | 6.60 |
94 | critical | `#d03b3b` | 4.68 | 3.62 |
95
96 Dark: same four steps — all clear 3:1 on the dark surface (`#1a1a19`) and remain
97 distinct from the dark categorical slots. On the light surface, warning and
98 serious are sub-3:1 by design; the **icon + label** pairing is the mitigation, so
99 a status color never carries meaning alone. These steps are deliberately distinct
100 from the categorical slots so a status color never impersonates a series.
101
102 ## Texture fill (the accessibility channel)
103
104 One hand-drawn **"Lines"** fill, used at **45° and its 135° mirror only**. Inked
105 tone-on-tone (a darker step of the fill's own ramp). On value scales it is
106 *ordered* (rotation steps with magnitude; arm angle carries the diverging sign).
107 Triggered by the accessibility setting, print, or `forced-colors` — never
108 decorative, never on by default.
109
110 ## Surfaces (for the validator)
111
112 - Light chart surface: `#fcfcfb`
113 - Dark chart surface: `#1a1a19`
114
115 These are the validator's built-in defaults. **When you swap in your own
116 palette, re-run against your own surfaces:**
117 `--surface <your-light> --mode light` and `--surface <your-dark> --mode dark` —
118 contrast and band results are only meaningful against the surface the chart
119 actually renders on.
120
121 ## Chart chrome & ink
122
123 | Role | Light | Dark |
124 |---|---|---|
125 | Chart surface | `#fcfcfb` | `#1a1a19` |
126 | Page plane | `#f9f9f7` | `#0d0d0d` |
127 | Primary ink | `#0b0b0b` | `#ffffff` |
128 | Secondary ink | `#52514e` | `#c3c2b7` |
129 | Muted (axis/labels) | `#898781` | `#898781` |
130 | Gridline (hairline) | `#e1e0d9` | `#2c2c2a` |
131 | Baseline / axis | `#c3c2b7` | `#383835` |
132 | Delta ↑ good (success text) | `#006300` | `#0ca30c` |
133 | Border (hairline ring) | `rgba(11,11,11,0.10)` | `rgba(255,255,255,0.10)` |
134
135 ## Filter controls
136
137 Filters are standard UI, not chart components — the chart layer only adds the
138 composition rules in `interaction.md`. A date-range control is a list of preset
139 rows (today, last 7/30/90 days, month-to-date) with selection marked by a 16px
140 bold check, hover as a ghost wash, and custom range behind a hairline in the
141 footer. Dimension filters are a standard combobox.
142
143 ## Typeface & figures
144
145 Everything — including the hero figure — stays in the system sans: `system-ui,
146 -apple-system, "Segoe UI", sans-serif`. No display or serif face anywhere. Large
147 standalone numbers (hero figure, stat-tile values) use the default proportional
148 figures; reserve `font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums` for columns that must align
149 vertically (table rows, axis ticks). Substitute your brand's UI sans here.
150 {
"command": "node \"C:\\Users\\dprei\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\claude\\bundled-skills\\2.1.205\\f55bc60ee4c273e41f42bb57ed3b6c7a\\dataviz\\scripts\\validate_palette.js\" \"#2a78d6,#1baf7a,#eda100,#008300\" --mode light; node \"C:\\Users\\dprei\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\claude\\bundled-skills\\2.1.205\\f55bc60ee4c273e41f42bb57ed3b6c7a\\dataviz\\scripts\\validate_palette.js\" \"#3987e5,#199e70,#c98500,#008300\" --mode dark"
}
Palette (light, surface #fcfcfb, categorical): 4 slots [PASS] Lightness band all 4 inside L 0.43–0.77 [PASS] Chroma floor all 4 >= 0.1 [PASS] CVD separation worst adjacent #008300↔#eda100 ΔE 24.2 (protan) · tritan 21.6 · normal 79.2 [WARN] Contrast vs surface below 3:1 — relief required (visible labels or table view): [["#1baf7a",2.74],["#eda100",2.11]] → ALL CHECKS PASS (CVD in the 8–12 floor band is legal ONLY with secondary encoding: direct labels, gaps, or texture) scope: categorical palettes only. For a lone status/text color check WCAG text contrast; for a sequential ramp, lightness monotonicity. Palette (dark, surface #1a1a19, categorical): 4 slots [PASS] Lightness band all 4 inside L 0.48–0.67 [PASS] Chroma floor all 4 >= 0.1 [WARN] CVD separation worst adjacent #008300↔#c98500 ΔE 10.3 (protan) · tritan 15.7 · normal 73.5 [PASS] Contrast vs surface all 4 >= 3:1 → ALL CHECKS PASS (CVD in the 8–12 floor band is legal ONLY with secondary encoding: direct labels, gaps, or texture) scope: categorical palettes only. For a lone status/text color check WCAG text contrast; for a sequential ramp, lightness monotonicity.
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Maze thinking — can a network think longer?</title>
<style>
.viz-root {
--surface-1: #fcfcfb; --page: #f9f9f7;
--ink: #0b0b0b; --ink-2: #52514e; --muted: #898781;
--grid: #e1e0d9; --axis: #c3c2b7; --border: rgba(11,11,11,0.10);
--s1: #2a78d6; --s2: #1baf7a; --s3: #eda100; --s4: #008300;
--good: #0ca30c; --crit: #d03b3b;
--wall: #3a3934; --corridor: #f4f3ef;
/* sequential blue ramp for prediction probability */
--seq: 205,226,251;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
.viz-root {
--surface-1: #1a1a19; --page: #0d0d0d;
--ink: #ffffff; --ink-2: #c3c2b7; --muted: #898781;
--grid: #2c2c2a; --axis: #383835; --border: rgba(255,255,255,0.10);
--s1: #3987e5; --s2: #199e70; --s3: #c98500; --s4: #008300;
--wall: #35342f; --corridor: #232320;
}
}
html, body { margin: 0; }
body { background: var(--page); }
.viz-root {
font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", sans-serif;
color: var(--ink); background: var(--page);
max-width: 1180px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 24px 20px 60px;
}
h1 { font-size: 26px; margin: 0 0 6px; }
h2 { font-size: 18px; margin: 36px 0 4px; }
.sub { color: var(--ink-2); font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; max-width: 72ch; margin: 0 0 18px; }
.controls { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 18px; align-items: center; margin: 14px 0; font-size: 13px; }
.ctl-group { display: flex; gap: 6px; align-items: center; }
.ctl-label { color: var(--muted); margin-right: 2px; }
button.opt {
font: inherit; color: var(--ink-2); background: var(--surface-1);
border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 6px; padding: 4px 10px; cursor: pointer;
}
button.opt.active { color: var(--ink); border-color: var(--ink-2); font-weight: 600; }
label.chk { color: var(--ink-2); display: flex; gap: 6px; align-items: center; cursor: pointer; }
#grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(230px, 1fr)); gap: 14px; }
.panel {
background: var(--surface-1); border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 10px;
padding: 10px 12px 12px;
}
.panel h3 { font-size: 13px; margin: 0 0 8px; font-weight: 600; display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 7px; }
.chip { width: 10px; height: 10px; border-radius: 3px; display: inline-block; }
.panel canvas { width: 100%; image-rendering: pixelated; border-radius: 4px; display: block; }
.panel .status { font-size: 12px; margin-top: 8px; color: var(--ink-2); }
.panel .status .ok { color: var(--good); font-weight: 600; }
.panel .note { font-size: 11px; color: var(--muted); margin-top: 2px; }
.stepbar {
display: flex; gap: 14px; align-items: center; margin: 16px 0 4px;
background: var(--surface-1); border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 10px; padding: 10px 14px;
}
.stepbar input[type=range] { flex: 1; }
.stepbar .steplabel { font-size: 13px; color: var(--ink-2); min-width: 130px; }
.stepbar .steplabel b { color: var(--ink); font-size: 15px; }
button.play {
font: inherit; font-size: 14px; background: var(--surface-1); color: var(--ink);
border: 1px solid var(--axis); border-radius: 8px; padding: 5px 14px; cursor: pointer; min-width: 74px;
}
.legendrow { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 16px; font-size: 13px; color: var(--ink-2); margin: 10px 0 14px; }
.legendrow .item { display: flex; gap: 6px; align-items: center; }
.dash { width: 18px; height: 0; border-top: 2px dashed; display: inline-block; }
.line { width: 18px; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid; display: inline-block; }
#chartgrid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(300px, 1fr)); gap: 14px; }
.chartbox { background: var(--surface-1); border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 10px; padding: 12px; position: relative; }
.chartbox h3 { font-size: 13px; margin: 0 0 4px; font-weight: 600; }
.chartbox .csub { font-size: 11px; color: var(--muted); margin-bottom: 6px; }
.tooltip {
position: absolute; pointer-events: none; background: var(--surface-1); color: var(--ink);
border: 1px solid var(--axis); border-radius: 8px; padding: 7px 10px; font-size: 12px;
box-shadow: 0 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,0.12); display: none; z-index: 5; white-space: nowrap;
}
.tooltip .trow { display: flex; gap: 8px; justify-content: space-between; }
.tooltip .tname { color: var(--ink-2); display: flex; gap: 5px; align-items: center; }
details { margin-top: 18px; font-size: 13px; color: var(--ink-2); }
summary { cursor: pointer; }
table { border-collapse: collapse; margin-top: 10px; font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; }
th, td { border: 1px solid var(--grid); padding: 4px 10px; text-align: right; font-size: 12px; }
th { color: var(--ink-2); font-weight: 600; }
.startdot { color: var(--good); font-weight: 700; }
.goaldot { color: var(--crit); font-weight: 700; }
footer { margin-top: 40px; font-size: 12px; color: var(--muted); }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="viz-root">
<header>
<h1>Can a network think longer?</h1>
<p class="sub">
Four networks were trained to mark the shortest path (<span class="startdot">start</span> →
<span class="goaldot">goal</span>) in small 13×13 mazes. Two are ordinary CNNs with a fixed
number of layers. Two are <b>recurrent</b>: they apply the same small block over and over, so at
test time we can simply run them for <i>more steps than they were trained with</i> — the
slider below is that dial. Blue shading = where the model currently believes the path is.
The question: does extra "thinking" let a network solve <b>bigger mazes than it ever saw in
training</b>?
</p>
</header>
<section>
<div class="controls">
<div class="ctl-group" id="sizebtns"><span class="ctl-label">Maze size</span></div>
<div class="ctl-group" id="mazebtns"><span class="ctl-label">Example</span></div>
<label class="chk"><input type="checkbox" id="truthchk"> show true path</label>
</div>
<div id="grid"></div>
<div class="stepbar">
<button class="play" id="playbtn">▶ Play</button>
<input type="range" id="stepslider" min="0" value="0">
<div class="steplabel">thinking step <b id="stepnum">1</b><span id="trainmark"></span></div>
</div>
</section>
<section id="chartsec">
<h2>Solved rate vs thinking steps</h2>
<p class="sub">Fraction of 500 unseen mazes solved <i>exactly</i> (predicted path mask identical
to the true one). Recurrent models are curves over test-time steps; fixed CNNs can't think
longer, so they are horizontal dashed lines. The vertical hairline marks the recurrent models'
training budget — everything to its right is extrapolation.</p>
<div class="legendrow" id="legend"></div>
<div id="chartgrid"></div>
<details id="tabledetails"><summary>Data table (all numbers)</summary><div id="tablewrap"></div></details>
</section>
<footer id="foot"></footer>
</div>
<script>
const DATA = __DATA__;
/* ---------- helpers ---------- */
const $ = (id) => document.getElementById(id);
const css = (name) => getComputedStyle(document.querySelector(".viz-root")).getPropertyValue(name).trim();
function b64ToBytes(s) {
const bin = atob(s), out = new Uint8Array(bin.length);
for (let i = 0; i < bin.length; i++) out[i] = bin.charCodeAt(i);
return out;
}
const SLOTS = ["--s1", "--s2", "--s3", "--s4"];
function runLabel(r) {
if (r.model === "fixed") return `CNN · depth ${r.depth}`;
return r.model === "recall" ? "Recurrent + recall" : "Recurrent · no recall";
}
const runs = DATA.runs.map((r, i) => ({ ...r, label: runLabel(r), slot: SLOTS[i % 4] }));
const recRuns = runs.filter(r => r.model !== "fixed");
const TRAIN_ITERS = recRuns.length ? recRuns[0].train_iters : 20;
// union of stored steps across recurrent runs (they share a schedule)
const STEPS = DATA.mazes[0] ? DATA.mazes[0].preds[recRuns[0].id].steps : [1];
/* decode mazes once */
for (const m of DATA.mazes) {
m.wallsA = b64ToBytes(m.walls);
m.pathA = b64ToBytes(m.path);
for (const rid in m.preds) m.preds[rid].mapsA = b64ToBytes(m.preds[rid].maps);
}
const sizes = [...new Set(DATA.mazes.map(m => m.cells))];
/* ---------- state ---------- */
let curSize = sizes[0], curMaze = 0, stepIdx = 0, showTruth = false, playing = null;
/* ---------- maze panels ---------- */
const SCALE = 8;
const panels = [];
function buildPanels() {
const grid = $("grid");
grid.innerHTML = "";
panels.length = 0;
for (const r of runs) {
const div = document.createElement("div");
div.className = "panel";
const fixedNote = r.model === "fixed"
? `<div class="note">fixed depth — no thinking dial</div>` : "";
div.innerHTML = `<h3><span class="chip" style="background:var(${r.slot})"></span>${r.label}</h3>
<canvas></canvas><div class="status"></div>${fixedNote}`;
grid.appendChild(div);
panels.push({ run: r, canvas: div.querySelector("canvas"), status: div.querySelector(".status") });
}
}
function seqColor(p) {
// p in [0,1] -> sequential blue, transparent below threshold
if (p < 0.06) return null;
const t = (p - 0.06) / 0.94;
// interpolate lightest (#cde2fb) -> darkest (#0d366b)
const a = [205, 226, 251], b = [13, 54, 107];
const c = a.map((v, i) => Math.round(v + (b[i] - v) * t));
return `rgb(${c[0]},${c[1]},${c[2]})`;
}
function currentMaze() {
return DATA.mazes.filter(m => m.cells === curSize)[curMaze];
}
function drawPanel(p) {
const m = currentMaze(), s = m.size, px = SCALE;
const cv = p.canvas;
cv.width = s * px; cv.height = s * px;
const ctx = cv.getContext("2d");
const pred = m.preds[p.run.id];
const isRec = p.run.model !== "fixed";
const si = isRec ? Math.min(stepIdx, pred.steps.length - 1) : 0;
const off = si * s * s;
const wall = css("--wall"), corridor = css("--corridor");
let solved = true;
for (let r = 0; r < s; r++) {
for (let c = 0; c < s; c++) {
const i = r * s + c;
const prob = pred.mapsA[off + i] / 255;
if ((prob >= 0.5 ? 1 : 0) !== m.pathA[i]) solved = false;
ctx.fillStyle = m.wallsA[i] ? wall : corridor;
ctx.fillRect(c * px, r * px, px, px);
if (!m.wallsA[i]) {
const col = seqColor(prob);
if (col) { ctx.fillStyle = col; ctx.fillRect(c * px, r * px, px, px); }
}
if (showTruth && m.pathA[i]) {
ctx.fillStyle = css("--ink-2");
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(c * px + px / 2, r * px + px / 2, px / 6, 0, 7);
ctx.fill();
}
}
}
const mark = (pos, col) => {
ctx.fillStyle = col;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(pos[1] * px + px / 2, pos[0] * px + px / 2, px / 2.6, 0, 7);
ctx.fill();
ctx.lineWidth = 1.5; ctx.strokeStyle = css("--surface-1"); ctx.stroke();
};
mark(m.start, css("--good"));
mark(m.goal, css("--crit"));
p.status.innerHTML = solved
? `<span class="ok">✓ solved</span> — path exactly right`
: `✗ not solved at this step`;
}
function drawAll() {
$("stepnum").textContent = STEPS[stepIdx];
$("trainmark").textContent = STEPS[stepIdx] > TRAIN_ITERS ? " — beyond training budget" : "";
for (const p of panels) drawPanel(p);
}
/* ---------- controls ---------- */
function optButtons(containerId, labels, onpick) {
const box = $(containerId);
const btns = labels.map((lab, i) => {
const b = document.createElement("button");
b.className = "opt"; b.textContent = lab;
b.onclick = () => { btns.forEach(x => x.classList.remove("active")); b.classList.add("active"); onpick(i); };
box.appendChild(b);
return b;
});
btns[0].classList.add("active");
return btns;
}
optButtons("sizebtns", sizes.map(c => `${2 * c + 1}×${2 * c + 1}`), i => { curSize = sizes[i]; curMaze = 0; drawAll(); });
const nPer = DATA.mazes.filter(m => m.cells === sizes[0]).length;
optButtons("mazebtns", Array.from({ length: nPer }, (_, i) => `${i + 1}`), i => { curMaze = i; drawAll(); });
$("truthchk").onchange = e => { showTruth = e.target.checked; drawAll(); };
const slider = $("stepslider");
slider.max = STEPS.length - 1;
slider.oninput = () => { stepIdx = +slider.value; drawAll(); };
$("playbtn").onclick = () => {
if (playing) { clearInterval(playing); playing = null; $("playbtn").textContent = "▶ Play"; return; }
if (stepIdx >= STEPS.length - 1) stepIdx = 0;
$("playbtn").textContent = "⏸ Pause";
playing = setInterval(() => {
stepIdx++;
if (stepIdx >= STEPS.length - 1) { stepIdx = STEPS.length - 1; clearInterval(playing); playing = null; $("playbtn").textContent = "▶ Play"; }
slider.value = stepIdx;
drawAll();
}, 90);
};
/* ---------- charts ---------- */
function buildLegend() {
const box = $("legend");
for (const r of runs) {
const it = document.createElement("span");
it.className = "item";
const swatch = r.model === "fixed" ? "dash" : "line";
it.innerHTML = `<span class="${swatch}" style="border-color:var(${r.slot})"></span>${r.label}`;
box.appendChild(it);
}
}
function buildCharts() {
if (!DATA.eval) { $("chartsec").style.display = "none"; return; }
buildLegend();
const evalSizes = Object.keys(DATA.eval[runs[0].id]).map(Number).sort((a, b) => a - b);
for (const c of evalSizes) makeChart(c);
buildTable(evalSizes);
}
function makeChart(cells) {
const iters = Object.keys(DATA.eval[recRuns[0].id][cells]).map(Number).sort((a, b) => a - b);
const W = 340, H = 220, ML = 38, MR = 14, MT = 10, MB = 28;
const lx = t => ML + (Math.log(t) - Math.log(iters[0])) / (Math.log(iters[iters.length - 1]) - Math.log(iters[0])) * (W - ML - MR);
const ly = v => MT + (1 - v) * (H - MT - MB);
const NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
const svg = document.createElementNS(NS, "svg");
svg.setAttribute("viewBox", `0 0 ${W} ${H}`);
const el = (tag, attrs, text) => {
const e = document.createElementNS(NS, tag);
for (const k in attrs) e.setAttribute(k, attrs[k]);
if (text != null) e.textContent = text;
svg.appendChild(e);
return e;
};
// gridlines + y ticks
for (const v of [0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1]) {
el("line", { x1: ML, x2: W - MR, y1: ly(v), y2: ly(v), stroke: "var(--grid)", "stroke-width": 1 });
el("text", { x: ML - 5, y: ly(v) + 3.5, "text-anchor": "end", "font-size": 9, fill: "var(--muted)" }, `${v * 100}%`);
}
// x ticks
for (const t of [5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200].filter(t => t >= iters[0] && t <= iters[iters.length - 1])) {
el("text", { x: lx(t), y: H - MB + 13, "text-anchor": "middle", "font-size": 9, fill: "var(--muted)" }, t);
}
el("text", { x: (ML + W - MR) / 2, y: H - 3, "text-anchor": "middle", "font-size": 9, fill: "var(--muted)" }, "test-time steps (log scale)");
// training-budget hairline
el("line", { x1: lx(TRAIN_ITERS), x2: lx(TRAIN_ITERS), y1: MT, y2: H - MB, stroke: "var(--axis)", "stroke-width": 1, "stroke-dasharray": "3 3" });
el("text", { x: lx(TRAIN_ITERS) + 3, y: MT + 8, "font-size": 8.5, fill: "var(--muted)" }, "training budget");
// baseline
el("line", { x1: ML, x2: W - MR, y1: ly(0), y2: ly(0), stroke: "var(--axis)", "stroke-width": 1 });
// fixed models: dashed horizontals
for (const r of runs.filter(r => r.model === "fixed")) {
const v = DATA.eval[r.id][cells]["0"].solved;
el("line", { x1: ML, x2: W - MR, y1: ly(v), y2: ly(v), stroke: `var(${r.slot})`, "stroke-width": 2, "stroke-dasharray": "6 4", opacity: 0.9 });
}
// recurrent curves
for (const r of recRuns) {
const pts = iters.map(t => [lx(t), ly(DATA.eval[r.id][cells][t].solved)]);
el("path", { d: "M" + pts.map(p => p.map(v => v.toFixed(1)).join(",")).join("L"), fill: "none", stroke: `var(${r.slot})`, "stroke-width": 2 });
for (const p of pts) el("circle", { cx: p[0], cy: p[1], r: 2.4, fill: `var(${r.slot})` });
}
const box = document.createElement("div");
box.className = "chartbox";
box.innerHTML = `<h3>${2 * cells + 1}×${2 * cells + 1} mazes</h3>
<div class="csub">${cells === (DATA.trainCells || 6) ? "training size" : "never seen in training"}</div>`;
box.appendChild(svg);
const tip = document.createElement("div");
tip.className = "tooltip";
box.appendChild(tip);
// hover: snap to nearest iteration
svg.addEventListener("mousemove", ev => {
const rect = svg.getBoundingClientRect();
const xf = (ev.clientX - rect.left) / rect.width * W;
let best = iters[0];
for (const t of iters) if (Math.abs(lx(t) - xf) < Math.abs(lx(best) - xf)) best = t;
let html = `<b>${best} steps</b>`;
for (const r of runs) {
const v = r.model === "fixed" ? DATA.eval[r.id][cells]["0"].solved : DATA.eval[r.id][cells][best].solved;
html += `<div class="trow"><span class="tname"><span class="chip" style="background:var(${r.slot})"></span>${r.label}</span><b>${(v * 100).toFixed(1)}%</b></div>`;
}
tip.innerHTML = html;
tip.style.display = "block";
tip.style.left = Math.min(ev.clientX - rect.left + 14, rect.width - 170) + "px";
tip.style.top = (ev.clientY - rect.top + 14) + "px";
});
svg.addEventListener("mouseleave", () => tip.style.display = "none");
$("chartgrid").appendChild(box);
}
function buildTable(evalSizes) {
const wrap = $("tablewrap");
for (const c of evalSizes) {
const iters = Object.keys(DATA.eval[recRuns[0].id][c]).map(Number).sort((a, b) => a - b);
let h = `<h3 style="font-size:13px;margin:14px 0 2px">${2 * c + 1}×${2 * c + 1} mazes — % solved</h3><table><tr><th>steps</th>`;
for (const r of runs) h += `<th>${r.label}</th>`;
h += "</tr>";
for (const t of iters) {
h += `<tr><td>${t}</td>`;
for (const r of runs) {
const v = r.model === "fixed" ? (t === iters[0] ? DATA.eval[r.id][c]["0"].solved : null) : DATA.eval[r.id][c][t].solved;
h += `<td>${v == null ? "—" : (v * 100).toFixed(1)}</td>`;
}
h += "</tr>";
}
h += "</table>";
wrap.innerHTML += h;
}
}
/* ---------- init ---------- */
buildPanels();
drawAll();
buildCharts();
$("foot").textContent = `Generated __DATE__ · models trained on 20,000 mazes of size 13×13 · `
+ `solved-rate curves from 500 unseen mazes per size · recurrent training budget ${TRAIN_ITERS} steps`;
window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)").addEventListener("change", drawAll);
</script>
</body>
</html>
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Now the builder that injects data into the template:
"""Build maze_viewer.html: inject viz_data.json (+ any eval.json results) into the template."""
import argparse
import datetime
import json
from pathlib import Path
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--out", default="maze_viewer.html")
args = ap.parse_args()
data = json.loads((ROOT / "viz_data.json").read_text())
evals = {}
for r in data["runs"]:
f = ROOT / "runs" / r["id"] / "eval.json"
if f.exists():
evals[r["id"]] = json.loads(f.read_text())
if evals and len(evals) == len(data["runs"]):
data["eval"] = evals
data["trainCells"] = 6
html = (ROOT / "viewer_template.html").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
html = html.replace("__DATA__", json.dumps(data))
html = html.replace("__DATE__", datetime.date.today().isoformat())
(ROOT / args.out).write_text(html, encoding="utf-8")
kb = (ROOT / args.out).stat().st_size // 1024
print(f"wrote {args.out} ({kb} KB, eval data: {'yes' if 'eval' in data else 'no'})")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\build_viewer.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\build_viewer.py --out _preview.html"
}
wrote _preview.html (23 KB, eval data: no)
{
"url": "file:///D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/_preview.html"
}
{
"serverId": "preview-local_b7be790d-1d85-4536-b851-2dea043307f4",
"tabId": "seed",
"reused": false,
"type": "browser",
"navOk": false
}
Browser pane opened at about:blank. The user declined opening https://file. Do not retry — ask what they'd like to do instead.{
"tabId": "main",
"url": "file:///D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/_preview.html"
}
navigation to https://file was denied or failed
{
"version": "0.0.1",
"configurations": [
{
"name": "maze-viewer",
"runtimeExecutable": "D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe",
"runtimeArgs": ["-m", "http.server", "8731", "--directory", "D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking"],
"port": 8731
}
]
}
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\.claude\launch.json (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"name": "maze-viewer"
}
{
"serverId": "c412a9b2-dd06-4ed1-8183-6b0ecfa5ae89",
"port": 8731,
"name": "maze-viewer",
"reused": false,
"previewId": "preview-local_b7be790d-1d85-4536-b851-2dea043307f4",
"tabId": "seed"
}
Server started successfully on port 8731. Opened tab "seed" at http://localhost:8731. Use tabId "seed" with read_page / computer / navigate; serverId is for preview_stop and preview_logs only.{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigated to http://localhost:8731
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "screenshot"
}
computer timed out after 30s. The Browser pane may be stuck (modal dialog, navigation hang, or unresponsive renderer). Check preview_console_logs for errors.
Question, I'm being asked for permissions for you to "act on https://file". Could you explain what exactly the permissions will do here?
That's a harmless artifact of a mistake I made, and you can safely deny it.
What happened: I tried to open the visualization preview directly from disk with a file:///D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/_preview.html URL in the in-app Browser pane. The pane doesn't support file:// URLs — it mis-parsed the scheme as if "file" were a website hostname and turned it into https://file, and its per-site approval system then asked you for permission to interact with that (nonexistent) site. Granting it would do nothing useful — there's no actual website called "https://file", and it would not grant me access to your local files (I already have that through the normal file tools you see me using).
I already worked around it the proper way: a tiny local web server (Python's built-in http.server, serving only the maze_thinking project folder on localhost:8731), and the viewer loads fine from there. So: deny/dismiss the prompt, nothing is blocked.
Status while we're here: Phase 2 training is chugging along in the background — the first model (CNN depth 8) is done, the second (CNN depth 16) just started, then the two recurrent models. Meanwhile I've built the evaluation script and a first draft of the interactive viewer (maze panels + thinking-step slider + solved-rate charts). I'll keep polishing the viewer against the sanity-run data while the real models train.
Good catch — that's the Windows Defender Firewall prompt, and it appeared because Python's built-in web server binds to all network interfaces by default, meaning other devices on your LAN could in principle reach it. The prompt asks whether to allow inbound connections from the network.
You can safely deny/cancel that too: loopback (localhost) traffic isn't affected by the firewall, so my preview keeps working either way. But the server shouldn't be listening on your LAN at all for this — let me restrict it to localhost-only right now, which also makes the firewall question moot.
{
"serverId": "c412a9b2-dd06-4ed1-8183-6b0ecfa5ae89"
}
Server c412a9b2-dd06-4ed1-8183-6b0ecfa5ae89 stopped
"runtimeArgs": ["-m", "http.server", "8731", "--directory", "D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking"],
"runtimeArgs": ["-m", "http.server", "8731", "--bind", "127.0.0.1", "--directory", "D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking"],
The file D:\claude_code\.claude\launch.json has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"name": "maze-viewer"
}
{
"serverId": "f4594ce7-3329-4497-9c5b-06c7c7b01578",
"port": 8731,
"name": "maze-viewer",
"reused": false,
"previewId": "preview-local_b7be790d-1d85-4536-b851-2dea043307f4",
"tabId": "seed"
}
Server started successfully on port 8731. Opened tab "seed" at http://localhost:8731. Use tabId "seed" with read_page / computer / navigate; serverId is for preview_stop and preview_logs only.{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigated to http://localhost:8731
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "screenshot"
}
computer timed out after 30s. The Browser pane may be stuck (modal dialog, navigation hang, or unresponsive renderer). Check preview_console_logs for errors.
{
"tabId": "seed",
"onlyErrors": true
}
No console logs.
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed"
}
Title: Maze thinking — can a network think longer? URL: http://localhost:8731 Source element: <body> --- Can a network think longer? Four networks were trained to mark the shortest path (start → goal) in small 13×13 mazes. Two are ordinary CNNs with a fixed number of layers. Two are recurrent: they apply the same small block over and over, so at test time we can simply run them for more steps than they were trained with — the slider below is that dial. Blue shading = where the model currently believes the path is. The question: does extra "thinking" let a network solve bigger mazes than it ever saw in training? Maze size Example show true path ▶ Play thinking step 1 Solved rate vs thinking steps Fraction of 500 unseen mazes solved exactly (predicted path mask identical to the true one). Recurrent models are curves over test-time steps; fixed CNNs can't think longer, so they are horizontal dashed lines. The vertical hairline marks the recurrent models' training budget — everything to its right is extrapolation. Data table (all numbers)
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
Page loads but the maze panels are missing — my JS crashes when the data contains no recurrent run (the sanity preview has only the fixed CNN). Fixing that edge case:
const TRAIN_ITERS = recRuns.length ? recRuns[0].train_iters : 20; // union of stored steps across recurrent runs (they share a schedule) const STEPS = DATA.mazes[0] ? DATA.mazes[0].preds[recRuns[0].id].steps : [1];
const TRAIN_ITERS = recRuns.length ? recRuns[0].train_iters : 20; // stored step schedule (recurrent runs share one; fixed-only data gets a single step) const stepsSource = recRuns[0] || runs[0]; const STEPS = DATA.mazes[0] ? DATA.mazes[0].preds[stepsSource.id].steps : [1];
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "& D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\build_viewer.py --out _preview.html"
}
wrote _preview.html (23 KB, eval data: no)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigated to http://localhost:8731
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "screenshot"
}
computer timed out after 30s. The Browser pane may be stuck (modal dialog, navigation hang, or unresponsive renderer). Check preview_console_logs for errors.
{
"tabId": "seed",
"filter": "interactive"
}
button "13×13" [ref_1] button "21×21" [ref_2] button "1" [ref_3] button "2" [ref_4] checkbox "on" [ref_5] type="checkbox" Viewport: 1280x720
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "javascript_exec",
"text": "JSON.stringify({panels: document.querySelectorAll('#grid .panel').length, canvases: [...document.querySelectorAll('canvas')].map(c=>c.width+'x'+c.height), slider: !!document.getElementById('stepslider'), sliderMax: document.getElementById('stepslider')?.max, play: !!document.getElementById('playbtn'), statuses: [...document.querySelectorAll('.status')].map(s=>s.textContent), foot: document.getElementById('foot').textContent})"
}
"{\"panels\":1,\"canvases\":[\"104x104\"],\"slider\":true,\"sliderMax\":\"0\",\"play\":true,\"statuses\":[\"✓ solved — path exactly right\"],\"foot\":\"Generated 2026-07-12 · models trained on 20,000 mazes of size 13×13 · solved-rate curves from 500 unseen mazes per size · recurrent training budget 20 steps\"}"Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
# Can a network think longer? Test-time compute on maze solving
*Free-choice round of the automating-ML-research experiment, 2026-07-12. Status: DRAFT —
methods written ahead of results; results sections filled in as phases complete.*
## Question
A fixed-depth network spends the same amount of computation on every input, however hard.
A weight-tied recurrent network applies one small block repeatedly, so the amount of
computation is a *dial we can turn at test time*. On a task with a natural notion of
problem size — shortest paths in mazes — we ask:
1. Does a recurrent net trained with a modest thinking budget keep improving when given
more steps at test time?
2. Does extra thinking let it solve **larger mazes than it ever saw in training**, and how
does that compare to simply making a feedforward net deeper?
3. Does re-feeding the input at every step ("recall") matter, as reported in the
deep-thinking literature?
## Setup
**Task.** Perfect mazes (spanning trees, unique solution path) on a c×c cell lattice,
generated by randomized DFS, rendered to (2c+1)×(2c+1) binary images. Input: 3 channels
(walls, start one-hot, goal one-hot). Target: binary mask of the unique start→goal
corridor path (BFS ground truth). Loss: per-pixel binary cross-entropy.
**Metric.** *Solved rate*: fraction of mazes where the thresholded prediction equals the
target mask on **every pixel**. (Pixel accuracy is uninformative — ~89% of pixels are
background; the all-zeros predictor gets ~0.89.)
**Models** (all fully convolutional, width 64, 3×3 kernels; ~0.6M params for the d8 CNN):
| name | description |
|---|---|
| CNN d8 | encoder + 8 untied residual blocks + head |
| CNN d16 | same, 16 blocks |
| Recurrent (no recall) | encoder + **one** residual block applied T times + head |
| Recurrent + recall | same, but the raw 3-channel input is re-concatenated to the state at every step |
**Training.** 20,000 mazes at c=6 (13×13 images), 20 epochs, Adam 1e-3, batch 32,
recurrent models trained at T=20. Val/test sets deduped against training mazes by hash
of (walls, start, goal).
**Evaluation.** 500 fresh mazes per size c ∈ {6, 8, 10, 12, 16} (13×13 up to 33×33
images; c=6 explicitly disjoint from training set). Recurrent models scored at
T ∈ {5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 200} from a single rollout's intermediate outputs.
## Results
*(pending — phase 2 training in progress)*
## The twist
*(to be chosen after phase 2: candidates are recall-gated recurrence, adaptive halting,
or a size curriculum — depends on where the interesting failure is)*
## Interactive visualization
`maze_viewer.html` (self-contained, no dependencies): pick a maze size and example, drag
the thinking-steps slider (or press play) and watch each model's path belief evolve;
solved-rate charts with the training budget marked. Built by
`viz_export.py` → `build_viewer.py`.
## Reproduction
```
ml_venv\Scripts\python.exe run_phase2.py # trains the 4 models (resumable)
ml_venv\Scripts\python.exe eval.py --run <name> # per-run size × iters sweep
ml_venv\Scripts\python.exe viz_export.py --runs p2_fixed_d8,p2_fixed_d16,p2_rec_plain_i20,p2_rec_recall_i20
ml_venv\Scripts\python.exe build_viewer.py
```
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
## Files
- Viz pipeline built and smoke-tested against the sanity checkpoint: viz_export.py → build_viewer.py → maze_viewer.html (template: viewer_template.html). Preview served via `python -m http.server 8731 --bind 127.0.0.1` (launch.json "maze-viewer"; MUST bind 127.0.0.1 or Windows firewall prompts David). Browser-pane screenshots time out while training hogs the CPU — verify visuals with javascript_tool/get_page_text, or wait. - `_preview.html` is the dev build from sanity data; final build will be maze_viewer.html. ## Files
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Here's where things stand:
Training (background, ~1 h to go): CNN depth 8 is done; CNN depth 16 is training now; the two recurrent models follow. The driver is resumable, so if you switch the PC off, relaunching run_phase2.py picks up where it left off. A monitor will wake me when it finishes or fails.
Built while waiting: the evaluation script (size × thinking-steps sweeps on mazes guaranteed disjoint from training data — including a fix for a caching bug I caught where a test set could have been silently generated without that guarantee), and the full interactive viewer pipeline. The viewer already runs against a throwaway checkpoint: maze panels with the probability overlay, thinking-step slider, play button, and solved-rate charts wired up. Colors follow a colorblind-validated palette, light and dark mode both.
Re: the two permission popups — both were side effects of me previewing the viewer, both safe to deny. The "https://file" one was the browser pane garbling a file:// URL; the Defender one was the preview server initially listening on your LAN. I've since pinned it to localhost-only (--bind 127.0.0.1), so the firewall question won't recur.
Next, once training completes: run the evaluation sweeps, look at whether extra thinking actually buys extrapolation to bigger mazes, pick the "twist" experiment based on where the interesting failure is, and rebuild the viewer with real data. I'll report back when results are in.
<task-notification> <task-id>b15k5z9es</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 2 maze training driver (4 runs) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] starting p2_rec_plain_i20</event> </task-notification>
{
"command": "foreach ($r in \"p2_fixed_d8\",\"p2_fixed_d16\") { $log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\$r\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; $last = $log.epochs[-1]; Write-Output \"$r : epoch $($last.epoch) loss $([math]::Round($last.loss,4)) val_solved $($last.val_solved) ($($last.secs)s/epoch)\" }"
}
p2_fixed_d8 : epoch 19 loss 0.0014 val_solved 0.98 (32.4s/epoch) p2_fixed_d16 : epoch 19 loss 0.0033 val_solved 0.997 (62.2s/epoch)
Both fixed CNNs are done and strong at training size: depth 8 solves 98.0% and depth 16 solves 99.7% of unseen 13×13 mazes. That's the bar the recurrent models need to clear — first on equal terms, then on the sizes the CNNs can't extrapolate to. The recurrent (no-recall) model is training now, recall variant after that; I'll run the full evaluation sweeps when the driver finishes.
<task-notification> <task-id>b15k5z9es</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 2 maze training driver (4 runs) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] starting p2_rec_recall_i20</event> </task-notification>
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p2_rec_plain_i20\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; $log.epochs | Select-Object -Last 3 | ForEach-Object { Write-Output \"epoch $($_.epoch) loss $([math]::Round($_.loss,4)) val_solved $($_.val_solved) ($($_.secs)s/epoch)\" }"
}
epoch 17 loss 0 val_solved 0.998 (69.6s/epoch) epoch 18 loss 0 val_solved 0.998 (71.1s/epoch) epoch 19 loss 0 val_solved 0.998 (71.0s/epoch)
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p2_rec_plain_i20\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; Write-Output $log.epochs[-1].loss"
}
7.77814214876558E-08
The recurrent (no recall) model also converged — 99.8% val solved at its training budget of 20 steps, loss ~8e-8 (genuinely tiny, not a logging artifact, which is itself interesting: it's very confident on training-size mazes). All three models so far are near-ceiling at 13×13, so the whole story will be decided by the extrapolation sweeps. The recall variant is the last one training; I'll launch the evaluations when it's done.
<task-notification> <task-id>b15k5z9es</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 2 maze training driver (4 runs) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] all phase 2 runs complete</event> </task-notification>
Training is complete. Running the evaluation sweeps for all four models (sizes 13×13 → 33×33, thinking steps 5 → 200):
{
"command": "$py = \"D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe\"; Set-Location D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking; foreach ($r in \"p2_fixed_d8\",\"p2_fixed_d16\",\"p2_rec_plain_i20\",\"p2_rec_recall_i20\") { & $py eval.py --run $r }",
"run_in_background": true
}
Command running in background with ID: bqk4ggsz1. Output is being written to: C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--claude-code\b329a898-02ba-4c46-bd39-840d2fff0281\tasks\bqk4ggsz1.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
{
"query": "select:TaskStop",
"max_results": 1
}
{
"type": "tool_reference",
"tool_name": "TaskStop"
}{
"task_id": "b15k5z9es"
}
{"message":"Successfully stopped task: b15k5z9es (tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\")","task_id":"b15k5z9es","task_type":"local_bash","command":"tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase2.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\""}All four models are trained; the evaluation sweeps are running in the background now (I've retired the training monitor). The headline numbers will land in a few minutes — then we'll see whether test-time thinking actually buys extrapolation.
<task-notification> <task-id>bqk4ggsz1</task-id> <tool-use-id>toolu_01J9gYJchG3EDZUzYSQtMzh4</tool-use-id> <output-file>C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--claude-code\b329a898-02ba-4c46-bd39-840d2fff0281\tasks\bqk4ggsz1.output</output-file> <status>completed</status> <summary>Background command "Run size × iteration evaluation sweeps for all four models" completed (exit code 0)</summary> </task-notification>
1 p2_fixed_d8 c=6: {0: 0.98}
2 p2_fixed_d8 c=8: {0: 0.336}
3 p2_fixed_d8 c=10: {0: 0.032}
4 p2_fixed_d8 c=12: {0: 0.006}
5 p2_fixed_d8 c=16: {0: 0.002}
6 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p2_fixed_d8\eval.json
7 p2_fixed_d16 c=6: {0: 0.99}
8 p2_fixed_d16 c=8: {0: 0.562}
9 p2_fixed_d16 c=10: {0: 0.124}
10 p2_fixed_d16 c=12: {0: 0.01}
11 p2_fixed_d16 c=16: {0: 0.002}
12 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p2_fixed_d16\eval.json
13 p2_rec_plain_i20 c=6: {5: 0.042, 10: 0.48, 20: 1.0, 30: 1.0, 50: 0.996, 100: 0.96, 200: 0.946}
14 p2_rec_plain_i20 c=8: {5: 0.006, 10: 0.096, 20: 0.764, 30: 0.986, 50: 0.976, 100: 0.928, 200: 0.898}
15 p2_rec_plain_i20 c=10: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.022, 20: 0.246, 30: 0.764, 50: 0.904, 100: 0.84, 200: 0.792}
16 p2_rec_plain_i20 c=12: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.006, 20: 0.072, 30: 0.368, 50: 0.752, 100: 0.698, 200: 0.644}
17 p2_rec_plain_i20 c=16: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.008, 30: 0.048, 50: 0.308, 100: 0.412, 200: 0.366}
18 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p2_rec_plain_i20\eval.json
19 p2_rec_recall_i20 c=6: {5: 0.048, 10: 0.43, 20: 1.0, 30: 0.982, 50: 0.652, 100: 0.286, 200: 0.232}
20 p2_rec_recall_i20 c=8: {5: 0.002, 10: 0.078, 20: 0.736, 30: 0.964, 50: 0.524, 100: 0.176, 200: 0.14}
21 p2_rec_recall_i20 c=10: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.022, 20: 0.264, 30: 0.662, 50: 0.25, 100: 0.054, 200: 0.038}
22 p2_rec_recall_i20 c=12: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.006, 20: 0.082, 30: 0.298, 50: 0.096, 100: 0.02, 200: 0.01}
23 p2_rec_recall_i20 c=16: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.012, 30: 0.044, 50: 0.008, 100: 0.0, 200: 0.0}
24 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p2_rec_recall_i20\eval.json
25 ap.add_argument("--train-iters", type=int, default=20, help="recurrent iterations") ap.add_argument("--train-iters", type=int, default=20, help="recurrent iterations")
ap.add_argument("--rand-iters", default=None, metavar="MIN,MAX",
help="sample recurrent iterations uniformly per batch (val still "
"uses --train-iters)")The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
for i in range(0, len(xtr), args.batch):
idx = perm[i : i + args.batch]
opt.zero_grad()
outp = model(xtr[idx], iters=iters) for i in range(0, len(xtr), args.batch):
idx = perm[i : i + args.batch]
opt.zero_grad()
if args.rand_iters and iters is not None:
lo, hi = (int(v) for v in args.rand_iters.split(","))
iters_b = int(torch.randint(lo, hi + 1, (1,)))
else:
iters_b = iters
outp = model(xtr[idx], iters=iters_b)The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
"""Phase 3 driver: retrain both recurrent variants with a randomized thinking budget.
T ~ U[10, 30] per batch (loss at the sampled step), so the network cannot tune its
dynamics to one readout time. Resumable like run_phase2.py.
"""
import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
PY = sys.executable
COMMON = ["--width", "64", "--n-train", "20000", "--n-val", "1000",
"--epochs", "20", "--seed", "0",
"--train-iters", "20", "--rand-iters", "10,30"]
RUNS = [
(["--model", "recurrent"], "p3_rec_plain_rand"),
(["--model", "recall"], "p3_rec_recall_rand"),
]
def finished(out: str) -> bool:
f = ROOT / "runs" / out / "log.json"
if not f.exists():
return False
log = json.loads(f.read_text())
return len(log["epochs"]) >= log["config"]["epochs"]
for extra, out in RUNS:
if finished(out):
print(f"[driver] {out}: already finished, skipping", flush=True)
continue
print(f"[driver] starting {out}", flush=True)
r = subprocess.run([PY, "-u", str(ROOT / "train.py"), *extra, *COMMON, "--out", out])
if r.returncode != 0:
print(f"[driver] {out} FAILED (rc={r.returncode}), aborting", flush=True)
sys.exit(1)
print("[driver] all phase 3 runs complete", flush=True)
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\run_phase3.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Start-Process -FilePath D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -ArgumentList \"-u\",\"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\run_phase3.py\" -RedirectStandardOutput D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3.log -RedirectStandardError D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3.err -WorkingDirectory D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking -WindowStyle Hidden; Start-Sleep -Seconds 5; Get-Content D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3.log, D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3.err"
}
[driver] starting p3_rec_plain_rand recurrent width=64 depth=8 iters=20 params=76,033
{
"command": "tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\"",
"persistent": true,
"timeout_ms": 3600000
}
Monitor started (task bigginb70, persistent — runs until TaskStop or session end). You will be notified on each event. Keep working — do not poll or sleep. Events may arrive while you are waiting for the user — an event is not their reply.
- Phase 2 (main comparison): TRAINING as of 2026-07-12 ~13:15. Driver `run_phase2.py` launched detached (log: logs/phase2.log), trains sequentially: fixed d8, fixed d16, recurrent-plain i20, recurrent-recall i20 (all w64, 20k mazes c=6, 20 epochs). Driver skips already-finished runs, so just relaunch it if the machine was rebooted. Monitor watching the log. After training: eval.py per run (sizes 6-16, iters 5-200).
- Phase 2 (main comparison): DONE, evals in runs/*/eval.json. Headlines (solved rate):
- Fixed CNNs collapse with size: d8 98%→0.2% (c=6→16), d16 99%→0.2%.
- Recurrent-plain EXTRAPOLATES via test-time compute: c=16: 0.8%@20it → 41%@100it
(mild decay to 37%@200). c=10: 90%@50it.
- Recurrent-RECALL OVERTHINKS catastrophically (opposite of Bansal et al.!):
c=6: 100%@20it → 23%@200it. Hypothesis: recall re-feeds input every step, so the
net can implicitly count steps / needn't store the maze in state → learns dynamics
tuned to readout at exactly T=20, not a stable attractor. Plain net must carry the
maze in its state and appears to settle instead.
- Phase 3 (twist): TRAINING as of ~16:05 — is overthinking an artifact of a predictable
readout time? Both recurrent variants retrained with T~U[10,30] per batch
(--rand-iters "10,30"), driver run_phase3.py (resumable), log logs/phase3.log,
runs p3_rec_plain_rand / p3_rec_recall_rand. Prediction: recall+randT stable to 200it;
open: does it beat plain's 41% at c=16? After: eval.py both, final viz + writeup.The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
## Results *(pending — phase 2 training in progress)* ## The twist *(to be chosen after phase 2: candidates are recall-gated recurrence, adaptive halting, or a size curriculum — depends on where the interesting failure is)*
## Results ### Phase 2: the main comparison Solved rate (%) by maze size; recurrent models shown at their best test-time step count and at their training budget (T=20): | model | 13×13 | 17×17 | 21×21 | 25×25 | 33×33 | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | CNN d8 | 98.0 | 33.6 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | | CNN d16 | 99.0 | 56.2 | 12.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | | Recurrent plain @T=20 | 100 | 76.4 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 0.8 | | Recurrent plain @best T | 100 (20) | 98.6 (30) | 90.4 (50) | 75.2 (50) | **41.2 (100)** | | Recurrent recall @T=20 | 100 | 73.6 | 26.4 | 8.2 | 1.2 | | Recurrent recall @best T | 100 (20) | 96.4 (30) | 66.2 (30) | 29.8 (30) | 4.4 (30) | Three findings: 1. **Fixed depth does not extrapolate.** Both CNNs are near-ceiling at the training size and collapse beyond it. Doubling depth helps one size step (d16 is 56% vs 34% at 17×17) and then dies equally. 2. **Test-time compute converts into problem size.** The plain recurrent net, trained only at T=20 on 13×13 mazes, solves 41% of 33×33 mazes when run for 100 steps — a 50× improvement over running it at its training budget (0.8%). Its curve is roughly stable after the peak (37% at T=200). 3. **Recall overthinks — the opposite of the literature.** The recall variant matches plain up to ~30 steps, then collapses *everywhere*, including on training-size mazes (100% at T=20 → 23% at T=200). In Bansal et al. (2022), recall was the ingredient that *fixed* overthinking; here, trained with a fixed budget and loss at the final step only, it *causes* it. Interpretation: with the input re-fed at every step, the state never needs to preserve the maze, and the dynamics are free to be non-stationary — the network can effectively count steps and schedule a solution that peaks at readout time. The plain net has no such luxury: everything it knows must persist in the state, which pushes it toward fixed-point-like dynamics. ## The twist (phase 3): overthinking as a training artifact If the recall net overthinks because it can rely on being read out at exactly T=20, then making the readout time unpredictable should remove the incentive. We retrain both recurrent variants identically except T is sampled uniformly from [10, 30] per batch (loss at the sampled step). *(results pending)*
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Set-Location D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe viz_export.py --runs p2_fixed_d8,p2_fixed_d16,p2_rec_plain_i20,p2_rec_recall_i20; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe build_viewer.py --out _preview.html",
"timeout": 600000
}
wrote viz_data.json (856 KB, 9 mazes, 4 runs) wrote _preview.html (879 KB, eval data: yes)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigation to http://localhost:8731 was denied or failed
{}
[]
Session preview: {
"previewId": "preview-local_b7be790d-1d85-4536-b851-2dea043307f4",
"tabs": [
{
"tabId": "seed",
"origin": "http://localhost:8731",
"isActive": true
}
]
}
Process entries above are for preview_stop / preview_logs only; address pages via tabId on the session preview.{
"name": "maze-viewer"
}
{
"serverId": "dc531137-4d65-4474-947c-40843b758cfb",
"port": 8731,
"name": "maze-viewer",
"reused": false,
"previewId": "preview-local_b7be790d-1d85-4536-b851-2dea043307f4",
"tabId": "seed"
}
Server started successfully on port 8731. Opened tab "seed" at http://localhost:8731. Use tabId "seed" with read_page / computer / navigate; serverId is for preview_stop and preview_logs only.{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigated to http://localhost:8731
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "screenshot"
}
computer timed out after 30s. The Browser pane may be stuck (modal dialog, navigation hang, or unresponsive renderer). Check preview_console_logs for errors.
Screenshot's still starved by the training job — verifying via DOM instead:
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "javascript_exec",
"text": "const r = {panels: document.querySelectorAll('#grid .panel').length, statuses: [...document.querySelectorAll('.status')].map(s=>s.textContent.slice(0,12)), sliderMax: document.getElementById('stepslider').max, charts: document.querySelectorAll('#chartgrid .chartbox').length, chartTitles: [...document.querySelectorAll('.chartbox h3')].map(h=>h.textContent), legendItems: document.querySelectorAll('#legend .item').length, tables: document.querySelectorAll('#tablewrap table').length, errs: window.__errs}; window.onerror = (m)=>{(window.__errs=window.__errs||[]).push(m)}; JSON.stringify(r)"
}
"{\"panels\":4,\"statuses\":[\"✓ solved — p\",\"✓ solved — p\",\"✗ not solved\",\"✗ not solved\"],\"sliderMax\":\"61\",\"charts\":5,\"chartTitles\":[\"13×13 mazes\",\"17×17 mazes\",\"21×21 mazes\",\"25×25 mazes\",\"33×33 mazes\"],\"legendItems\":4,\"tables\":5}"Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"command": "foreach ($r in \"p2_fixed_d8\",\"p2_fixed_d16\",\"p2_rec_plain_i20\",\"p2_rec_recall_i20\") { $log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\$r\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; Write-Output \"$r : $($log.params) params\" }"
}
p2_fixed_d8 : 592129 params p2_fixed_d16 : 1181953 params p2_rec_plain_i20 : 76033 params p2_rec_recall_i20 : 77761 params
| model | 13×13 | 17×17 | 21×21 | 25×25 | 33×33 | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | CNN d8 | 98.0 | 33.6 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | | CNN d16 | 99.0 | 56.2 | 12.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| model | params | 13×13 | 17×17 | 21×21 | 25×25 | 33×33 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | CNN d8 | 592k | 98.0 | 33.6 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | | CNN d16 | 1,182k | 99.0 | 56.2 | 12.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
| Recurrent plain @T=20 | 100 | 76.4 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 0.8 | | Recurrent plain @best T | 100 (20) | 98.6 (30) | 90.4 (50) | 75.2 (50) | **41.2 (100)** | | Recurrent recall @T=20 | 100 | 73.6 | 26.4 | 8.2 | 1.2 | | Recurrent recall @best T | 100 (20) | 96.4 (30) | 66.2 (30) | 29.8 (30) | 4.4 (30) |
| Recurrent plain @T=20 | 76k | 100 | 76.4 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 0.8 | | Recurrent plain @best T | 76k | 100 (20) | 98.6 (30) | 90.4 (50) | 75.2 (50) | **41.2 (100)** | | Recurrent recall @T=20 | 78k | 100 | 73.6 | 26.4 | 8.2 | 1.2 | | Recurrent recall @best T | 78k | 100 (20) | 96.4 (30) | 66.2 (30) | 29.8 (30) | 4.4 (30) | (Note the recurrent nets have **8–15× fewer parameters** than the CNNs they beat — capacity is in iteration, not in weights.)
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Phase 2 is now fully written up in REPORT.md, and there's a nice bonus finding: the recurrent nets that dominate on extrapolation have 8–15× fewer parameters than the CNNs (76k vs 592k–1.2M) — the capacity lives in iteration, not weights.
The viewer is rebuilt with real Phase 2 data and all its pieces verified (4 model panels, thinking slider, 5 solved-rate charts, data tables). Phase 3 — retraining both recurrent variants with an unpredictable thinking budget to test whether the recall net's overthinking collapse is a training artifact — is running in the background with a monitor on it. I'll pick this up when training finishes (~40 min).
<task-notification> <task-id>bigginb70</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 3 maze training (2 random-budget recurrent runs) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] starting p3_rec_recall_rand</event> </task-notification>
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_plain_rand\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; Write-Output \"final epoch: loss $($log.epochs[-1].loss) val_solved $($log.epochs[-1].val_solved)\""
}
final epoch: loss 0.268708208706975 val_solved 0.0
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_plain_rand\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; $log.epochs | ForEach-Object { Write-Output \"e$($_.epoch) loss=$([math]::Round($_.loss,4)) solved=$($_.val_solved)\" }"
}
e0 loss=0.2665 solved=0.002 e1 loss=0.1869 solved=0.007 e2 loss=0.0976 solved=0.812 e3 loss=0.0354 solved=0.935 e4 loss=0.0157 solved=0.857 e5 loss=0.0218 solved=0.955 e6 loss=0.0228 solved=0.9 e7 loss=0.0157 solved=0.956 e8 loss=0.0111 solved=0.984 e9 loss=0.0099 solved=0.973 e10 loss=0.0249 solved=0.86 e11 loss=0.0098 solved=0.997 e12 loss=0.0093 solved=0.142 e13 loss=0.2366 solved=0.0 e14 loss=0.2042 solved=0.027 e15 loss=0.1557 solved=0.576 e16 loss=0.0218 solved=0.957 e17 loss=0.0148 solved=0.961 e18 loss=0.0322 solved=0.002 e19 loss=0.2687 solved=0.0
opt = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=args.lr)
lossf = nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss()
log = {"config": vars(args), "params": count_params(model), "epochs": []} opt = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=args.lr)
lossf = nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss()
log = {"config": vars(args), "params": count_params(model), "epochs": []}
best_solved = -1.0The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
torch.save(model.state_dict(), out / "model.pt")
(out / "log.json").write_text(json.dumps(log, indent=1)) torch.save(model.state_dict(), out / "model.pt")
if solved >= best_solved: # >= so later, equally good epochs win (more converged)
best_solved = solved
log["best"] = {"epoch": epoch, "val_solved": solved}
torch.save(model.state_dict(), out / "model_best.pt")
(out / "log.json").write_text(json.dumps(log, indent=1))The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\train.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
def count_params(model: nn.Module) -> int:
return sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters())def count_params(model: nn.Module) -> int:
return sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters())
def ckpt_path(run_dir):
"""Best-val checkpoint if the run saved one, else the last-epoch checkpoint."""
best = run_dir / "model_best.pt"
return best if best.exists() else run_dir / "model.pt"The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\models.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
from models import make_model from train import get_dataset
from models import ckpt_path, make_model from train import get_dataset
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\eval.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(run_dir / "model.pt", weights_only=True))
model.eval() ckpt = ckpt_path(run_dir)
print(f"loading {ckpt.name}")
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(ckpt, weights_only=True))
model.eval()The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\eval.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
from models import make_model from train import get_dataset
from models import ckpt_path, make_model from train import get_dataset
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viz_export.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(ROOT / "runs" / name / "model.pt", weights_only=True))
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(ckpt_path(ROOT / "runs" / name), weights_only=True))
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viz_export.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Rename-Item D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_plain_rand p3_rec_plain_rand_v1_unstable"
}
(PowerShell completed with no output)
- Phase 3 (twist): TRAINING as of ~16:05 — is overthinking an artifact of a predictable readout time? Both recurrent variants retrained with T~U[10,30] per batch (--rand-iters "10,30"), driver run_phase3.py (resumable), log logs/phase3.log, runs p3_rec_plain_rand / p3_rec_recall_rand. Prediction: recall+randT stable to 200it; open: does it beat plain's 41% at c=16? After: eval.py both, final viz + writeup.
- Phase 3 (twist): is overthinking an artifact of a predictable readout time? Both
recurrent variants retrained with T~U[10,30] per batch (--rand-iters "10,30"),
driver run_phase3.py (resumable), log logs/phase3.log.
- FINDING/incident: plain+randT trains UNSTABLY — hit 99.7% val (epoch 11) but
repeatedly collapses to ~0% (epochs 12-13, 18-19), ended collapsed. Old train.py
only saved last epoch ⇒ checkpoint useless. Run preserved as
runs/p3_rec_plain_rand_v1_unstable (log = instability evidence).
train.py now ALSO saves model_best.pt (best val_solved, ties→later epoch);
eval.py/viz_export.py load best-if-exists (phase-2 runs: last==converged, fine).
- p3_rec_recall_rand still training under OLD train.py (no best-ckpt): check its
epoch trajectory when done; if final epochs collapsed, rename *_v1_unstable and
retrain. Then relaunch run_phase3.py to retrain plain_rand with best-ckpt saving.
- Prediction unchanged: recall+randT stable to 200it; open: does it beat plain's
41% at c=16? After: eval.py both, final viz + writeup.The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Phase 3 hit a snag that's also a finding: the plain recurrent net trained with a random thinking budget learns the task (99.7% validation mid-training) but keeps suffering sudden collapses to ~0% — and it happened to end on one, with only the last-epoch checkpoint saved. I've patched training to keep a best-validation checkpoint, preserved the unstable run's log as evidence, and set things up to retrain it once the recall+random run (still going, ~15 min) finishes. The instability contrast — plain destabilizes under random readout, does recall stabilize it? — is shaping into part of the story.
<task-notification> <task-id>bigginb70</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 3 maze training (2 random-budget recurrent runs) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] all phase 3 runs complete</event> </task-notification>
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_recall_rand\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; $log.epochs | ForEach-Object { Write-Output \"e$($_.epoch) loss=$([math]::Round($_.loss,4)) solved=$($_.val_solved)\" }"
}
e0 loss=0.2527 solved=0.01 e1 loss=0.1823 solved=0.006 e2 loss=0.1140 solved=0.567 e3 loss=0.0629 solved=0.854 e4 loss=0.0321 solved=0.963 e5 loss=0.0245 solved=0.964 e6 loss=0.0139 solved=0.617 e7 loss=0.0101 solved=0.992 e8 loss=0.0154 solved=0.998 e9 loss=0.0085 solved=0.965 e10 loss=0.0043 solved=0.998 e11 loss=0.0050 solved=1.0 e12 loss=0.0028 solved=0.998 e13 loss=0.0064 solved=0.997 e14 loss=0.0077 solved=0.995 e15 loss=0.0038 solved=0.998 e16 loss=0.0027 solved=0.997 e17 loss=0.0042 solved=0.941 e18 loss=0.0022 solved=0.999 e19 loss=0.0031 solved=0.919
{
"command": "Rename-Item D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_recall_rand p3_rec_recall_rand_v1; Start-Process -FilePath D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -ArgumentList \"-u\",\"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\run_phase3.py\" -RedirectStandardOutput D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3b.log -RedirectStandardError D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3b.err -WorkingDirectory D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking -WindowStyle Hidden; Start-Sleep -Seconds 5; Get-Content D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3b.log, D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\phase3b.err"
}
[driver] starting p3_rec_plain_rand recurrent width=64 depth=8 iters=20 params=76,033
{
"command": "tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\"",
"persistent": true,
"timeout_ms": 3600000
}
Monitor started (task bknhheke7, persistent — runs until TaskStop or session end). You will be notified on each event. Keep working — do not poll or sleep. Events may arrive while you are waiting for the user — an event is not their reply.
{
"task_id": "bigginb70"
}
{"message":"Successfully stopped task: bigginb70 (tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\")","task_id":"bigginb70","task_type":"local_bash","command":"tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\""} - p3_rec_recall_rand still training under OLD train.py (no best-ckpt): check its
epoch trajectory when done; if final epochs collapsed, rename *_v1_unstable and
retrain. Then relaunch run_phase3.py to retrain plain_rand with best-ckpt saving. - recall+randT v1 trained STABLY (0.92-1.0 from epoch 7, no collapses — contrast
with plain!) but ended at 0.919 with no best ckpt (old train.py). Renamed to
p3_rec_recall_rand_v1; BOTH variants retraining under patched train.py as of
~17:10 (driver relaunched, log logs/phase3b.log, monitor armed). Training
stability contrast (plain collapses under randT, recall doesn't) is itself a
phase-3 result — recall stabilizes TRAINING; question remains if it also fixes
test-time overthinking.The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
If the recall net overthinks because it can rely on being read out at exactly T=20, then making the readout time unpredictable should remove the incentive. We retrain both recurrent variants identically except T is sampled uniformly from [10, 30] per batch (loss at the sampled step). *(results pending)*
If the recall net overthinks because it can rely on being read out at exactly T=20, then making the readout time unpredictable should remove the incentive. We retrain both recurrent variants identically except T is sampled uniformly from [10, 30] per batch (loss at the sampled step). **A training-stability contrast appeared immediately.** Under the random budget, the *plain* net trains violently: it reaches 99.7% validation solved, but repeatedly collapses to ~0% within an epoch or two (its first run ended mid-collapse, which is also how we learned to keep best-validation checkpoints). The *recall* net trains smoothly under the same regime — no collapses, 92–100% from epoch 7 on. So recall does stabilize something, just not where the phase-2 story suggested: it stabilizes *training under an unpredictable budget*, plausibly because re-fed input gives every step a fixed anchor, while the plain net's only memory of the maze is a state that the variable-length objective keeps perturbing. *(test-time sweeps of the retrained models pending)*
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
Both random-budget variants are retraining under the patched trainer (monitored, ~50 min). The stability contrast is already written into the report as a Phase 3 finding: under an unpredictable thinking budget, the plain net's training repeatedly collapses while recall's stays smooth — so "recall stabilizes" turns out to be true about training, not (so far) about test-time overthinking. The final test-time sweeps of the retrained models will settle whether random budgets also cure the overthinking collapse and who wins at 33×33. I'll run evaluations and the final viewer build when training lands.
<task-notification> <task-id>bknhheke7</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 3 retrain (best-ckpt saving) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] starting p3_rec_recall_rand</event> </task-notification>
{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_plain_rand\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; Write-Output \"best: epoch $($log.best.epoch) val_solved $($log.best.val_solved)\"; Write-Output \"last: epoch $($log.epochs[-1].epoch) val_solved $($log.epochs[-1].val_solved)\""
}
best: epoch 11 val_solved 0.997 last: epoch 19 val_solved 0.0
The plain+random retrain reproduced the instability exactly (99.7% peak at epoch 11, ends collapsed at 0%) — this time with the 99.7% checkpoint safely saved. That's now a replicated finding, not a one-off. The recall+random retrain is the last run; evaluation sweeps fire when it's done.
<task-notification> <task-id>bknhheke7</task-id> <summary>Monitor event: "Phase 3 retrain (best-ckpt saving) — start/finish/failure lines"</summary> <event>[driver] all phase 3 runs complete</event> </task-notification>
{
"task_id": "bknhheke7"
}
{"message":"Successfully stopped task: bknhheke7 (tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\")","task_id":"bknhheke7","task_type":"local_bash","command":"tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/phase3b.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\""}{
"command": "$log = Get-Content \"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\runs\\p3_rec_recall_rand\\log.json\" | ConvertFrom-Json; Write-Output \"best: epoch $($log.best.epoch) val_solved $($log.best.val_solved); last: $($log.epochs[-1].val_solved)\""
}
best: epoch 11 val_solved 1.0; last: 0.919
{
"command": "$py = \"D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe\"; Set-Location D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking; foreach ($r in \"p3_rec_plain_rand\",\"p3_rec_recall_rand\") { & $py eval.py --run $r }",
"run_in_background": true
}
Command running in background with ID: bihi0h0hm. Output is being written to: C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--claude-code\b329a898-02ba-4c46-bd39-840d2fff0281\tasks\bihi0h0hm.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
Both retrains landed with clean best checkpoints (plain: 99.7%, recall: 100% validation). The decisive evaluation sweeps are running now — a few minutes.
<task-notification> <task-id>bihi0h0hm</task-id> <tool-use-id>toolu_01Y35bgGCJLrWfZNj4ePwsJo</tool-use-id> <output-file>C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--claude-code\b329a898-02ba-4c46-bd39-840d2fff0281\tasks\bihi0h0hm.output</output-file> <status>completed</status> <summary>Background command "Run evaluation sweeps for the two phase-3 models" completed (exit code 0)</summary> </task-notification>
1 loading model_best.pt
2 p3_rec_plain_rand c=6: {5: 0.006, 10: 0.612, 20: 0.998, 30: 0.994, 50: 0.842, 100: 0.414, 200: 0.24}
3 p3_rec_plain_rand c=8: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.062, 20: 0.666, 30: 0.898, 50: 0.786, 100: 0.368, 200: 0.192}
4 p3_rec_plain_rand c=10: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.01, 20: 0.244, 30: 0.516, 50: 0.602, 100: 0.258, 200: 0.086}
5 p3_rec_plain_rand c=12: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.002, 20: 0.06, 30: 0.192, 50: 0.342, 100: 0.17, 200: 0.04}
6 p3_rec_plain_rand c=16: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.008, 30: 0.03, 50: 0.054, 100: 0.044, 200: 0.006}
7 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p3_rec_plain_rand\eval.json
8 loading model_best.pt
9 p3_rec_recall_rand c=6: {5: 0.026, 10: 0.782, 20: 0.996, 30: 0.998, 50: 0.624, 100: 0.186, 200: 0.078}
10 p3_rec_recall_rand c=8: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.088, 20: 0.862, 30: 0.956, 50: 0.67, 100: 0.11, 200: 0.04}
11 p3_rec_recall_rand c=10: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.358, 30: 0.746, 50: 0.594, 100: 0.066, 200: 0.012}
12 p3_rec_recall_rand c=12: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.076, 30: 0.348, 50: 0.368, 100: 0.03, 200: 0.002}
13 p3_rec_recall_rand c=16: {5: 0.0, 10: 0.0, 20: 0.0, 30: 0.024, 50: 0.05, 100: 0.0, 200: 0.0}
14 wrote D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\runs\p3_rec_recall_rand\eval.json
15 """Seed-1 replicates of the four recurrent configs (the runs behind the headline claims).
Fresh seed changes init AND the training/val data streams (data seeds are 1000+seed /
2000+seed), so this tests robustness to both. Resumable like the other drivers.
"""
import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
PY = sys.executable
COMMON = ["--width", "64", "--n-train", "20000", "--n-val", "1000",
"--epochs", "20", "--seed", "1", "--train-iters", "20"]
RUNS = [
(["--model", "recurrent"], "p2_rec_plain_i20_s1"),
(["--model", "recall"], "p2_rec_recall_i20_s1"),
(["--model", "recurrent", "--rand-iters", "10,30"], "p3_rec_plain_rand_s1"),
(["--model", "recall", "--rand-iters", "10,30"], "p3_rec_recall_rand_s1"),
]
def finished(out: str) -> bool:
f = ROOT / "runs" / out / "log.json"
if not f.exists():
return False
log = json.loads(f.read_text())
return len(log["epochs"]) >= log["config"]["epochs"]
for extra, out in RUNS:
if finished(out):
print(f"[driver] {out}: already finished, skipping", flush=True)
continue
print(f"[driver] starting {out}", flush=True)
r = subprocess.run([PY, "-u", str(ROOT / "train.py"), *extra, *COMMON, "--out", out])
if r.returncode != 0:
print(f"[driver] {out} FAILED (rc={r.returncode}), aborting", flush=True)
sys.exit(1)
print("[driver] all replicate runs complete", flush=True)
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\run_replicates.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Start-Process -FilePath D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe -ArgumentList \"-u\",\"D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\run_replicates.py\" -RedirectStandardOutput D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\replicates.log -RedirectStandardError D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\replicates.err -WorkingDirectory D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking -WindowStyle Hidden; Start-Sleep -Seconds 5; Get-Content D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\replicates.log, D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking\\logs\\replicates.err"
}
[driver] starting p2_rec_plain_i20_s1
{
"command": "tail -f -n +1 \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/replicates.log\" \"D:/claude_code/maze_thinking/logs/replicates.err\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E --line-buffered \"driver|Traceback|Error|FAILED|complete\"",
"persistent": true,
"timeout_ms": 3600000
}
Monitor started (task bvruin3a6, persistent — runs until TaskStop or session end). You will be notified on each event. Keep working — do not poll or sleep. Events may arrive while you are waiting for the user — an event is not their reply.
Replicates are training under a monitor. Writing the Phase 3 results in while they run:
- Prediction unchanged: recall+randT stable to 200it; open: does it beat plain's
41% at c=16? After: eval.py both, final viz + writeup. - RESULT (prediction FAILED, interestingly): random budget does NOT cure
overthinking — recall+randT still collapses (99.8%@30 → 7.8%@200 at c=6), and
plain+randT LOSES its emergent stability/extrapolation (c=6: 24%@200; c=16 peak
41%→5.4%). Story flip: fixed-budget state-only recurrence had emergent
attractor-like stability; randomizing the budget teaches "be right in [10,30]"
and destroys it. Caveat: phase-3 ckpts are best-of-unstable-training at T=20
(doesn't select for long-T stability). Evals in runs/p3_*/eval.json.
- Replicates: seed-1 reruns of all 4 recurrent configs TRAINING as of ~18:10
(run_replicates.py, logs/replicates.log, monitor armed; ~100 min). Then: eval all
four (NOTE: c=6 test cache is excluded vs seed-0 train only; eval.py now RAISES on
overlap with seed-1 train — if it does, handle then), check claims replicate,
final viz (likely 5 models: CNN d16 + 4 recurrent; validate 5-slot palette),
finish writeup, two subagent reviews (code + writeup), leave preview open for David.The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\STATUS.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
*(test-time sweeps of the retrained models pending)*
**And the prediction failed.** Solved rate (%), best-validation checkpoints: | model | 13×13 @30 | 13×13 @200 | 33×33 peak (steps) | |---|---|---|---| | Plain, fixed T=20 (phase 2) | 100 | 94.6 | **41.2 (100)** | | Plain, T~U[10,30] | 99.4 | 24.0 | 5.4 (50) | | Recall, fixed T=20 (phase 2) | 98.2 | 23.2 | 4.4 (30) | | Recall, T~U[10,30] | 99.8 | 7.8 | 5.0 (50) | Randomizing the budget did not remove overthinking — it *spread* it. The recall net still collapses past its trained range; worse, the plain net — the phase-2 extrapolation champion — loses both its long-horizon stability (24% at T=200 on training-size mazes) and almost all of its size extrapolation (41% → 5% peak at 33×33). The revised story: the plain fixed-budget net's stability was not a default that recall lacked, but an *emergent* property — apparently attractor-like dynamics that arise when (a) the state is the only carrier of maze information and (b) the training objective never asks the dynamics to be anything other than "converged by step 20". Training on a range of budgets replaces "converge" with "be right anywhere in [10, 30]", which is satisfiable by transient dynamics that pass through correctness and move on — and both architectures learn exactly that. **Caveats.** Phase-3 checkpoints are best-validation selections from (for the plain variant) unstable training, selected at T=20 — a criterion that does not reward long-T stability. Bansal et al.'s stabilizing recipe also differs from plain random-T: their incremental-progress loss supervises *intermediate* steps and truncates backprop, which plausibly is the load-bearing ingredient rather than budget randomness per se — we test only the latter. All runs are single-seed pending the replicate sweep.
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\REPORT.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "node \"C:\\Users\\dprei\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\claude\\bundled-skills\\2.1.205\\f55bc60ee4c273e41f42bb57ed3b6c7a\\dataviz\\scripts\\validate_palette.js\" \"#2a78d6,#1baf7a,#eda100,#008300,#4a3aa7\" --mode light; node \"C:\\Users\\dprei\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\claude\\bundled-skills\\2.1.205\\f55bc60ee4c273e41f42bb57ed3b6c7a\\dataviz\\scripts\\validate_palette.js\" \"#3987e5,#199e70,#c98500,#008300,#9085e9\" --mode dark"
}
Palette (light, surface #fcfcfb, categorical): 5 slots [PASS] Lightness band all 5 inside L 0.43–0.77 [PASS] Chroma floor all 5 >= 0.1 [PASS] CVD separation worst adjacent #008300↔#eda100 ΔE 24.2 (protan) · tritan 21.6 · normal 79.2 [WARN] Contrast vs surface below 3:1 — relief required (visible labels or table view): [["#1baf7a",2.74],["#eda100",2.11]] → ALL CHECKS PASS (CVD in the 8–12 floor band is legal ONLY with secondary encoding: direct labels, gaps, or texture) scope: categorical palettes only. For a lone status/text color check WCAG text contrast; for a sequential ramp, lightness monotonicity. Palette (dark, surface #1a1a19, categorical): 5 slots [PASS] Lightness band all 5 inside L 0.48–0.67 [PASS] Chroma floor all 5 >= 0.1 [WARN] CVD separation worst adjacent #008300↔#c98500 ΔE 10.3 (protan) · tritan 15.7 · normal 73.5 [PASS] Contrast vs surface all 5 >= 3:1 → ALL CHECKS PASS (CVD in the 8–12 floor band is legal ONLY with secondary encoding: direct labels, gaps, or texture) scope: categorical palettes only. For a lone status/text color check WCAG text contrast; for a sequential ramp, lightness monotonicity.
Palette passes. Wiring the fifth series and random-budget labels into the pipeline:
meta = [{"id": name, "model": cfg["model"], "depth": cfg["depth"],
"train_iters": cfg["train_iters"]} for name, cfg, _ in runs] meta = [{"id": name, "model": cfg["model"], "depth": cfg["depth"],
"train_iters": cfg["train_iters"], "rand_iters": cfg.get("rand_iters")}
for name, cfg, _ in runs]The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viz_export.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
--s1: #2a78d6; --s2: #1baf7a; --s3: #eda100; --s4: #008300;
--good: #0ca30c; --crit: #d03b3b; --s1: #2a78d6; --s2: #1baf7a; --s3: #eda100; --s4: #008300; --s5: #4a3aa7;
--good: #0ca30c; --crit: #d03b3b;The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
--s1: #3987e5; --s2: #199e70; --s3: #c98500; --s4: #008300;
--s1: #3987e5; --s2: #199e70; --s3: #c98500; --s4: #008300; --s5: #9085e9;
The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
const SLOTS = ["--s1", "--s2", "--s3", "--s4"];
function runLabel(r) {
if (r.model === "fixed") return `CNN · depth ${r.depth}`;
return r.model === "recall" ? "Recurrent + recall" : "Recurrent · no recall";
}
const runs = DATA.runs.map((r, i) => ({ ...r, label: runLabel(r), slot: SLOTS[i % 4] }));const SLOTS = ["--s1", "--s2", "--s3", "--s4", "--s5"];
function runLabel(r) {
if (r.model === "fixed") return `CNN · depth ${r.depth}`;
const base = r.model === "recall" ? "Recurrent + recall" : "Recurrent · no recall";
return r.rand_iters ? `${base} · random budget` : base;
}
const runs = DATA.runs.map((r, i) => ({ ...r, label: runLabel(r), slot: SLOTS[i % SLOTS.length] }));The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
<p class="sub">
Four networks were trained to mark the shortest path (<span class="startdot">start</span> →
<span class="goaldot">goal</span>) in small 13×13 mazes. Two are ordinary CNNs with a fixed
number of layers. Two are <b>recurrent</b>: they apply the same small block over and over, so at
test time we can simply run them for <i>more steps than they were trained with</i> — the
slider below is that dial. Blue shading = where the model currently believes the path is.
The question: does extra "thinking" let a network solve <b>bigger mazes than it ever saw in
training</b>?
</p> <p class="sub">
These networks were trained to mark the shortest path (<span class="startdot">start</span> →
<span class="goaldot">goal</span>) in small 13×13 mazes. The CNN has a fixed number of layers.
The rest are <b>recurrent</b>: they apply the same small block over and over, so at test time
we can simply run them for <i>more steps than they were trained with</i> — the slider below is
that dial ("random budget" = trained with an unpredictable 10–30 steps instead of always 20).
Blue shading = where the model currently believes the path is. The question: does extra
"thinking" let a network solve <b>bigger mazes than it ever saw in training</b> — and can it
also think <i>too long</i>?
</p>The file D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\viewer_template.html has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Set-Location D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe viz_export.py --runs p2_fixed_d16,p2_rec_plain_i20,p2_rec_recall_i20,p3_rec_plain_rand,p3_rec_recall_rand; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe build_viewer.py --out _preview.html",
"timeout": 600000
}
wrote viz_data.json (1678 KB, 9 mazes, 5 runs) wrote _preview.html (1704 KB, eval data: yes)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"url": "http://localhost:8731/_preview.html"
}
navigated to http://localhost:8731
Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "javascript_exec",
"text": "JSON.stringify({panels: [...document.querySelectorAll('.panel h3')].map(h=>h.textContent), charts: document.querySelectorAll('.chartbox').length, legend: [...document.querySelectorAll('#legend .item')].map(i=>i.textContent), tables: document.querySelectorAll('#tablewrap table').length})"
}
"{\"panels\":[\"CNN · depth 16\",\"Recurrent · no recall\",\"Recurrent + recall\",\"Recurrent · no recall · random budget\",\"Recurrent + recall · random budget\"],\"charts\":5,\"legend\":[\"CNN · depth 16\",\"Recurrent · no recall\",\"Recurrent + recall\",\"Recurrent · no recall · random budget\",\"Recurrent + recall · random budget\"],\"tables\":5}"Tab Context: - Executed on tabId: seed - Available tabs: • tabId seed: "Maze thinking — can a network think longer?" (http://localhost:8731)
{
"tabId": "seed",
"action": "screenshot"
}
computer timed out after 30s. The Browser pane may be stuck (modal dialog, navigation hang, or unresponsive renderer). Check preview_console_logs for errors.
"""Measure state dynamics of recurrent runs: relative state change per step.
For each run, rolls N mazes for --iters steps recording mean ||s_{t+1}-s_t|| / ||s_t||
per step. Attractor-like (fixed-point) dynamics -> ratio decays toward 0; transient
dynamics -> stays high. Writes dynamics.json {run: {cells: [per-step ratios]}}.
"""
import argparse
import json
from pathlib import Path
import torch
from models import ckpt_path, make_model
from train import get_dataset
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent
@torch.no_grad()
def state_deltas(model, x, iters):
s = model.encode(x)
out = []
for _ in range(iters):
s_next = model.step(s, x)
num = (s_next - s).flatten(1).norm(dim=1)
den = s.flatten(1).norm(dim=1).clamp_min(1e-8)
out.append((num / den).mean().item())
s = s_next
return out
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--runs", required=True)
ap.add_argument("--sizes", default="6,10,16")
ap.add_argument("--n", type=int, default=50)
ap.add_argument("--iters", type=int, default=200)
args = ap.parse_args()
results = {}
for name in args.runs.split(","):
cfg = json.loads((ROOT / "runs" / name / "log.json").read_text())["config"]
assert cfg["model"] in ("recurrent", "recall"), f"{name} is not recurrent"
model = make_model(cfg["model"], cfg["width"], cfg["depth"])
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(ckpt_path(ROOT / "runs" / name), weights_only=True))
model.eval()
results[name] = {}
for c in (int(s) for s in args.sizes.split(",")):
x, _, _ = get_dataset(500, c, 3000)
results[name][c] = state_deltas(model, x[: args.n], args.iters)
last = results[name][c][-1]
print(f"{name} c={c}: delta@1={results[name][c][0]:.4f} "
f"@20={results[name][c][19]:.4f} @200={last:.6f}", flush=True)
(ROOT / "dynamics.json").write_text(json.dumps(results))
print("wrote dynamics.json")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
File created successfully at: D:\claude_code\maze_thinking\analyze_dynamics.py (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)
{
"command": "Set-Location D:\\claude_code\\maze_thinking; & D:\\claude_code\\ml_venv\\Scripts\\python.exe analyze_dynamics.py --runs p2_rec_plain_i20,p2_rec_recall_i20,p3_rec_plain_rand,p3_rec_recall_rand",
"run_in_background": true
}
Command running in background with ID: b2d3yf9k6. Output is being written to: C:\Users\dprei\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--claude-code\b329a898-02ba-4c46-bd39-840d2fff0281\tasks\b2d3yf9k6.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
The dynamics analysis is running alongside training. Once it and the seed-1 replicates land, the remaining pipeline is: replicate evals → check the headline claims hold across seeds → final viewer build + visual pass → finish the writeup → two independent subagent reviews. Waiting on the background jobs now.